Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
CHI has 6 actionable review nodes, but 2 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage6 actionable of 11 nodes · 9 planning anchors · 2 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Lauri MarkkanenExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Lauri Markkanen before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Lauri Markkanen would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Lauri Markkanen remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Zach LaVineExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Zach LaVine before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Zach LaVine would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Zach LaVine remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2021
2 decisions share this date
Denzel ValentineContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Denzel Valentine. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Lauri MarkkanenContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Lauri Markkanen. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Thaddeus YoungExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Thaddeus Young before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Thaddeus Young would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Thaddeus Young remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Tomas SatoranskyExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Tomas Satoransky before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Tomas Satoransky would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Tomas Satoransky remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2022
3 decisions share this date
Thaddeus YoungContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Thaddeus Young. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Tomas SatoranskyContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Tomas Satoransky. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Zach LaVineContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Zach LaVine. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
No supported date
2 decisions share this date
Denzel ValentineExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide Review a possible extension path for Denzel Valentine before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Denzel Valentine would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Denzel Valentine remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Thaddeus YoungGuarantee reviewGuarantee structure review exact decision date unavailableTeam subject to contract terms decide Review the visible guarantee structure for Thaddeus Young. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
Guarantee or reported schedule continuesWaive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Exact guarantee decision date unresolvedCBA legality: Exact guarantee mechanism date waiver and stretch rules unresolvedMarket price: Not market evidenceSalary input: Reported schedule visible guarantee timing unresolvedDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Guarantee or reported schedule continues”: The reported schedule for Thaddeus Young is preserved subject to the guarantee source limits.If “Waive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state”: A waiver or conversion path for Thaddeus Young cannot be priced without the exact guarantee date and applicable CBA mechanics.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 5, 20191 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jul 8, 20201 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20212 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for CHI. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jul 6, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jul 7, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20223 decisions · 3 players
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for CHI. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.Lauri MarkkanenExtension review before the contract horizonJul 5, 2019 → Jun 30, 2021
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Zach LaVineExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2020 → Jun 30, 2022
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Thaddeus YoungExtension review before the contract horizonJul 6, 2021 → Jun 30, 2022
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Tomas SatoranskyExtension review before the contract horizonJul 7, 2021 → Jun 30, 2022
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Denzel ValentineExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2021
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Thaddeus YoungGuarantee review before contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2022
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.
