Gingeball

League Board

Which teams have the most open conditional paths — and how much still needs a dated test?

Latest
Decision volumePlanning windowsSequencing workloadKeep/exit optionalityCompetitive window
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

sorted by open paths · click a column to re-sort · click a team for its workspace · open a row for why it is here

TeamBranchesOpen pathsNeeds planningNeeds evidenceNeeds dated testPath abstentionsBasketball gaps
LAL

LAL has 26 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
262053226274
MIA

MIA has 26 conditional decision branches and 19 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
26197726522
UTA

UTA has 24 conditional decision branches and 19 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
241952924240
LAC

LAC has 20 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Conditional team path map available exact execution unresolvedCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
20182222000
ORL

ORL has 22 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
221842622220
PHX

PHX has 24 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
24186624484
BOS

BOS has 16 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
161511716160
CHI

CHI has 16 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
161511716166
GSW

GSW has 20 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
20155520400
SAS

SAS has 20 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
201552520200
DEN

DEN has 16 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
161331916160
HOU

HOU has 18 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
181352318180
SAC

SAC has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
141311514144
BRK

BRK has 12 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
121201212124
DAL

DAL has 16 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
16121416358
IND

IND has 16 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
161242016160
CLE

CLE has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
121111312120
NOP

NOP has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
101001010100
PHI

PHI has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
1010010101010
CHO

CHO has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
10901102110
NYK

NYK has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
109011101110
POR

POR has 10 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
10911110102
WAS

WAS has 12 conditional decision branches and 9 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
1293312242
MIL

MIL has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
8808882
OKC

OKC has 12 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
12841612122
DET

DET has 8 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
860108108
MIN

MIN has 6 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence
66006120
TOR

TOR has 6 conditional decision branches and 5 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
6507676
ATL

ATL has 4 conditional decision branches and 4 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test.

Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
4404440
MEM

MEM has no actionable option, extension or guarantee branches to map.

Coverage:WithheldWithheld — No governed core playersCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved
0000000

League rows compare evidence coverage and conditional path counts, not team quality or front-office success.