Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
NOP has 5 actionable review nodes, but 2 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage5 actionable of 11 nodes · 9 planning anchors · 2 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
CJ McCollumExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for CJ McCollum before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: CJ McCollum would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for CJ McCollum remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Brandon IngramExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Brandon Ingram before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Brandon Ingram would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Brandon Ingram remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2024
2 decisions share this date
CJ McCollumContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for CJ McCollum. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jonas ValanciunasContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Jonas Valanciunas. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Dyson DanielsExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Dyson Daniels before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Dyson Daniels would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Dyson Daniels remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2025
2 decisions share this date
Brandon IngramContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Brandon Ingram. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Larry Nance Jr.Contract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Larry Nance Jr.. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Dyson DanielsContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Dyson Daniels. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jordan HawkinsContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Jordan Hawkins. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
No supported date
2 decisions share this date
Jonas ValanciunasExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide Review a possible extension path for Jonas Valanciunas before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Jonas Valanciunas would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Jonas Valanciunas remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Larry Nance Jr.Extension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide Review a possible extension path for Larry Nance Jr. before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Larry Nance Jr. would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Larry Nance Jr. remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 30, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Nov 28, 20231 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20242 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NOP. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jul 8, 20241 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20252 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NOP. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jun 30, 20261 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20271 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.CJ McCollumExtension review before the contract horizonJul 30, 2021 → Jun 30, 2024
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Brandon IngramExtension review before the contract horizonNov 28, 2023 → Jun 30, 2025
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Dyson DanielsExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2024 → Jun 30, 2026
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Jonas ValanciunasExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2024
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Larry Nance Jr.Extension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2025
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.
