← Team Metrics
Latest

Boston Celtics

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What are the Boston Celtics in 2025-26, and what needs front-office attention?

BOS 2025-26: the clearest roster problems were Rebounding, Rim pressure, Interior finishing. The strongest covered areas were Rim protection, Creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Payton Pritchard. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2026 · 11 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim protection
83rd percentile
Derrick White carries 32.6%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

BOS 2025-26 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 83.3 league percentile. Derrick White supplied 32.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 3 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Creation
79th percentile
Jaylen Brown carries 33.4%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

BOS 2025-26 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 79.2 league percentile. Jaylen Brown supplied 33.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 3 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rebounding
8th percentile
Jaylen Brown carries 24.4%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

BOS 2025-26 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 8.3 league percentile. Jaylen Brown supplied 24.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 4 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Rim pressure
8th percentile
Jaylen Brown carries 36.8%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

BOS 2025-26 Rim pressure: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 8.3 league percentile. Jaylen Brown supplied 36.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 4 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Interior finishing
0th percentile
Neemias Queta carries 38.7%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

BOS 2025-26 Interior finishing: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Neemias Queta supplied 38.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 6 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength79th percentileJaylen Brown · 33.4%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedStructural team problem25th percentileDerrick White · 32.4%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedStructural team problem0th percentileNeemias Queta · 38.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemUnderfunded structural need
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league58th percentilePayton Pritchard · 31.3%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJaylen BrownRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem8th percentileJaylen Brown · 24.4%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Rim pressureSupportedCritical team problem8th percentileJaylen Brown · 36.8%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileDerrick White · 32.6%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJaylen BrownRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league63rd percentilePayton Pritchard · 25.1%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJaylen BrownRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Payton Pritchard
Single-skill dependence

BOS did not have strong functional backup for Payton Pritchard in creation; removing him cost about 30.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jaylen Brown.

rotation 65%loses 30.6% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Payton Pritchard

Jaylen Brown · Derrick White · Neemias Queta · Sam Hauser · Baylor Scheierman

shrunk net 5.104 over 215 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,672 possessions · off floor 2,677 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Neemias Queta

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jaylen Brown

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jaylen Brown

Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jaylen Brown

Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Derrick White

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Payton Pritchard

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Derrick White

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$187.6M
Share of cap
121%
Tax line
$261K under
First apron
$8.31M under
Second apron
$20.2M under

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is interior finishing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 88% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $187,633,972Source-reported payroll: $187,492,509 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.