← Team Metrics
Latest

Brooklyn Nets

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Brooklyn Nets in 2016-17, and what needed front-office attention?

BRK 2016-17: the clearest roster problems were Rebounding, Shooting and spacing, Defensive event creation. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Trevor Booker, Joe Harris, Isaiah Whitehead, Spencer Dinwiddie. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionUnder cap on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rebounding
19th percentile
Trevor Booker carries 29.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

BRK 2016-17 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 19.2 league percentile. Trevor Booker supplied 29.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Shooting and spacing
15th percentile
Joe Harris carries 27.5%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

BRK 2016-17 Shooting and spacing: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 15.4 league percentile. Joe Harris supplied 27.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Defensive event creation
19th percentile
Rondae Hollis-Jefferson carries 29.5%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

BRK 2016-17 Defensive event creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 19.2 league percentile. Rondae Hollis-Jefferson supplied 29.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileSpencer Dinwiddie · 17.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedStructural team problem19th percentileRondae Hollis-Jefferson · 29.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league27th percentileBrook Lopez · 35.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileSpencer Dinwiddie · 18.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRondae Hollis-JeffersonNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem19th percentileTrevor Booker · 29.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league62nd percentileBrook Lopez · 26.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileBrook Lopez · 31.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRondae Hollis-JeffersonNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedStructural team problem15th percentileJoe Harris · 27.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRondae Hollis-JeffersonNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Rondae Hollis-Jefferson
Single-skill dependence

BRK did not have strong functional backup for Rondae Hollis-Jefferson in event creation; removing him cost about 29.5% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Trevor Booker.

rotation 45%loses 29.5% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Rondae Hollis-Jefferson

Brook Lopez · Trevor Booker · Bojan Bogdanovic · Sean Kilpatrick · Isaiah Whitehead

shrunk net -3.516 over 356 possessions

on floor 3,384 possessions · off floor 4,071 possessions

Trevor Booker
Single-skill dependence

BRK did not have strong functional backup for Trevor Booker in rebounding; removing him cost about 29.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Brook Lopez.

rotation 44%loses 29.1% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Trevor Booker

Randy Foye · Brook Lopez · Jeremy Lin · Rondae Hollis-Jefferson · Caris LeVert

shrunk net 0.428 over 513 possessions

on floor 3,333 possessions · off floor 4,177 possessions

Joe Harris
Single-skill dependence

BRK did not have strong functional backup for Joe Harris in shooting; removing him cost about 27.5% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Spencer Dinwiddie.

rotation 29%loses 27.5% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Joe Harris

Randy Foye · Brook Lopez · Jeremy Lin · Rondae Hollis-Jefferson · Caris LeVert

shrunk net 0.428 over 513 possessions

on floor 2,166 possessions · off floor 5,343 possessions

Isaiah Whitehead
Lineup performance dependence

BRK lineups performed 6.0 points per 100 possessions better with Isaiah Whitehead than without him. The best supported alternative was [Randy Foye, Brook Lopez, Jeremy Lin, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Caris LeVert] over 513 possessions.

rotation 42%loses 13.7% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Isaiah Whitehead

Randy Foye · Brook Lopez · Jeremy Lin · Rondae Hollis-Jefferson · Caris LeVert

shrunk net 0.428 over 513 possessions

on floor 3,063 possessions · off floor 4,437 possessions

Spencer Dinwiddie
Lineup performance dependence

BRK lineups performed 3.7 points per 100 possessions better with Spencer Dinwiddie than without him. The best supported alternative was [Randy Foye, Brook Lopez, Jeremy Lin, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Caris LeVert] over 513 possessions.

rotation 34%loses 17.5% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Spencer Dinwiddie

Randy Foye · Brook Lopez · Jeremy Lin · Rondae Hollis-Jefferson · Caris LeVert

shrunk net 0.428 over 513 possessions

on floor 2,468 possessions · off floor 5,036 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedSelected player charges appeared below the cap, but holds and incomplete roster charges prevent a clean cap-room claim.
Selected player charges
$82.3M
Share of cap
87%
Tax line
$31.0M under
First apron
$35.0M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to rim protection; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 78% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $82,314,232Source-reported payroll: $82,391,482 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.