← Team Metrics
Latest

Brooklyn Nets

2018-19
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Brooklyn Nets in 2018-19, and what needed front-office attention?

BRK 2018-19: the clearest roster problems were Rebounding, Defensive event creation, Interior finishing. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Ed Davis, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2019 · 10 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rebounding
0th percentile
Ed Davis carries 49.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

BRK 2018-19 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Ed Davis supplied 49.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Defensive event creation
14th percentile
D'Angelo Russell carries 29.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

BRK 2018-19 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 14.3 league percentile. D'Angelo Russell supplied 29.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Interior finishing
0th percentile
Jarrett Allen carries 31.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

BRK 2018-19 Interior finishing: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Jarrett Allen supplied 31.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league38th percentileD'Angelo Russell · 39.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem14th percentileD'Angelo Russell · 29.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedStructural team problem0th percentileJarrett Allen · 31.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league33rd percentileD'Angelo Russell · 39.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldD'Angelo RussellNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileEd Davis · 49.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league29th percentileJarrett Allen · 20.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league48th percentileJarrett Allen · 35.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldD'Angelo RussellNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk33rd percentileJoe Harris · 41.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldD'Angelo RussellNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Ed Davis
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

BRK was highly dependent on Ed Davis. Removing him cost about 49.8% of rebounding production, and lineups with him performed 9.9 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Allen Crabbe, Joe Harris, D'Angelo Russell, Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, Jarrett Allen] over 188 possessions.

rotation 35%loses 49.8% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Ed Davis

Allen Crabbe · Joe Harris · D'Angelo Russell · Rondae Hollis-Jefferson · Jarrett Allen

shrunk net 2.582 over 188 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,675 possessions · off floor 5,251 possessions

Rondae Hollis-Jefferson
Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

BRK had an observed replacement lineup for Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Jared Dudley, Joe Harris, D'Angelo Russell, Caris LeVert, Jarrett Allen] at -1.3 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 405 possessions.

rotation 30%loses 14.8% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Rondae Hollis-Jefferson

Jared Dudley · Joe Harris · D'Angelo Russell · Caris LeVert · Jarrett Allen

shrunk net -1.264 over 405 possessions

on floor 2,444 possessions · off floor 5,488 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$118.9M
Share of cap
117%
Tax line
$4.88M under
First apron
$11.0M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to shooting and spacing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 66% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $101,869,000Luxury tax line: $123,733,000First apron: $129,817,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $118,850,600Source-reported payroll: $118,850,600 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.