Chicago Bulls
2017-18Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
CHI has 7 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for Zach LaVine before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Bobby Portis before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Jerian Grant before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Zach LaVine. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Kris Dunn before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Paul Zipser before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Denzel Valentine before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Bobby Portis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jerian Grant. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Justin Holiday. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Paul Zipser. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Denzel Valentine. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Kris Dunn. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Cristiano Felicio. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Lauri Markkanen. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Justin Holiday before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for CHI. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
4 review nodes share this planning anchor for CHI. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for CHI. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for CHI. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.