← Team Metrics
Latest

Cleveland Cavaliers

2021-22
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Cleveland Cavaliers in 2021-22, and what needed front-office attention?

CLE 2021-22: the clearest roster problems were Creation, Passing connectivity, Defensive event creation. The strongest covered areas were Rim protection, Interior finishing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Lauri Markkanen, Jarrett Allen, Ricky Rubio. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim protection
86th percentile
Evan Mobley carries 37.1%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

CLE 2021-22 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 86.4 league percentile. Evan Mobley supplied 37.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 9 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Interior finishing
82nd percentile
Jarrett Allen carries 23.0%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

CLE 2021-22 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 81.8 league percentile. Jarrett Allen supplied 23.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 9 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Creation
0th percentile
Darius Garland carries 46.9%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

CLE 2021-22 Creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Darius Garland supplied 46.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 5 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Passing connectivity
5th percentile
Darius Garland carries 43.1%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

CLE 2021-22 Passing connectivity: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.5 league percentile. Darius Garland supplied 43.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 5 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Defensive event creation
18th percentile
Darius Garland carries 24.3%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

CLE 2021-22 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 18.2 league percentile. Darius Garland supplied 24.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 9 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileDarius Garland · 46.9%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem18th percentileDarius Garland · 24.3%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength82nd percentileJarrett Allen · 23.0%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedCritical team problem5th percentileDarius Garland · 43.1%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDarius GarlandRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league55th percentileJarrett Allen · 31.3%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league36th percentileEvan Mobley · 27.4%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength86th percentileEvan Mobley · 37.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJarrett AllenRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedStructural team problem23rd percentileDarius Garland · 28.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDarius GarlandRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Lauri Markkanen
Lineup performance dependence

CLE lineups performed 3.3 points per 100 possessions better with Lauri Markkanen than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jarrett Allen, Darius Garland, Dean Wade, Isaac Okoro, Evan Mobley] over 204 possessions.

rotation 48%loses 17.6% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Lauri Markkanen

Jarrett Allen · Darius Garland · Dean Wade · Isaac Okoro · Evan Mobley

shrunk net 6.817 over 204 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,489 possessions · off floor 3,699 possessions

Jarrett Allen
Lineup performance dependence

CLE lineups performed 4.0 points per 100 possessions better with Jarrett Allen than without him. The best supported alternative was [Caris LeVert, Lauri Markkanen, Darius Garland, Isaac Okoro, Evan Mobley] over 165 possessions.

rotation 46%loses 28.9% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jarrett Allen

Caris LeVert · Lauri Markkanen · Darius Garland · Isaac Okoro · Evan Mobley

shrunk net 0.418 over 165 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,274 possessions · off floor 3,914 possessions

Ricky Rubio
Lineup performance dependence

CLE lineups performed 6.2 points per 100 possessions better with Ricky Rubio than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jarrett Allen, Darius Garland, Dean Wade, Isaac Okoro, Evan Mobley] over 204 possessions.

rotation 24%loses 12.4% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Ricky Rubio

Jarrett Allen · Darius Garland · Dean Wade · Isaac Okoro · Evan Mobley

shrunk net 6.817 over 204 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,765 possessions · off floor 5,423 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Evan Mobley

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jarrett Allen

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jarrett Allen

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Evan Mobley

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Evan Mobley

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Dean Wade

Creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Evan Mobley

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Evan Mobley

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$136.4M
Share of cap
121%
Tax line
$220K under
First apron
$6.62M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 84% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $112,414,000Luxury tax line: $136,606,000First apron: $143,002,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $136,385,911

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.