← Team Metrics
Latest

Cleveland Cavaliers

2024-25
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Cleveland Cavaliers in 2024-25, and what needed front-office attention?

CLE 2024-25: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Screening, Creation, Passing connectivity. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Jarrett Allen, Isaac Okoro. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported9 supported · 2 withheld
Cap positionTax to first apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Screening
100th percentile
Jarrett Allen carries 54.2%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

CLE 2024-25 Screening: this was a team strength, but much of it came from Jarrett Allen. Jarrett Allen supplied 54.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

Creation
88th percentile
Donovan Mitchell carries 27.4%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

CLE 2024-25 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 87.5 league percentile. Donovan Mitchell supplied 27.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 5 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Passing connectivity
88th percentile
Darius Garland carries 23.3%
Availability: Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

CLE 2024-25 Passing connectivity: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 87.5 league percentile. Darius Garland supplied 23.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. A major strength was at risk in 4 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — full situation-room coverage available.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength88th percentileDonovan Mitchell · 27.4%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileDonovan Mitchell · 19.5%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileJarrett Allen · 35.3%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength88th percentileDarius Garland · 23.3%Absences repeatedly put a strength at riskHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJarrett AllenRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league54th percentileJarrett Allen · 31.9%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league54th percentileEvan Mobley · 38.7%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileJarrett Allen · 38.3%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ScreeningSupportedTeam strength concentrated in one player100th percentileJarrett Allen · 54.2%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league71st percentileDarius Garland · 21.8%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDonovan MitchellRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Jarrett Allen
Single-skill dependence

CLE did not have strong functional backup for Jarrett Allen in interior finish; removing him cost about 35.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Evan Mobley.

rotation 59%loses 35.3% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jarrett Allen

Caris LeVert · Georges Niang · Donovan Mitchell · Sam Merrill · Evan Mobley

shrunk net 8.568 over 162 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,730 possessions · off floor 3,289 possessions

Isaac Okoro
Lineup performance dependence

CLE lineups performed 5.7 points per 100 possessions better with Isaac Okoro than without him. The best supported alternative was [Caris LeVert, Georges Niang, Donovan Mitchell, Sam Merrill, Evan Mobley] over 162 possessions.

rotation 27%loses 6.0% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Isaac Okoro

Caris LeVert · Georges Niang · Donovan Mitchell · Sam Merrill · Evan Mobley

shrunk net 8.568 over 162 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,095 possessions · off floor 5,931 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Donovan Mitchell

Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Donovan Mitchell

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Evan Mobley

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Darius Garland

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly put a strength at risk

created in 1 · strength at risk in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Darius Garland

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was in the tax but below the first apron on selected player charges.
Selected player charges
$171.8M
Share of cap
122%
Tax line
$1.02M over
First apron
$6.30M under
Second apron
$17.1M under

Most salary is mapped to passing connectivity; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 86% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $140,588,000Luxury tax line: $170,814,000First apron: $178,132,000Second apron: $188,931,000Selected player charges: $171,830,703Source-reported payroll: $172,471,107 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available9 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.