← Team Metrics
Latest

Dallas Mavericks

2017-18
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Dallas Mavericks in 2017-18, and what needed front-office attention?

DAL 2017-18: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection, Defensive event creation, Rim pressure. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Dwight Powell, Harrison Barnes, Dennis Smith Jr., Dirk Nowitzki, Yogi Ferrell. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionUnder cap on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2018 · 6 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; recent availability layer unavailable.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
0th percentile
Dirk Nowitzki carries 28.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

DAL 2017-18 Rim protection: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Dirk Nowitzki supplied 28.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Defensive event creation
15th percentile
Dwight Powell carries 28.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

DAL 2017-18 Defensive event creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 14.8 league percentile. Dwight Powell supplied 28.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Rim pressure
19th percentile
Harrison Barnes carries 32.9%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

DAL 2017-18 Rim pressure: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 18.5 league percentile. Harrison Barnes supplied 32.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league56th percentileDennis Smith Jr. · 26.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Defensive event creationSupportedStructural team problem15th percentileDwight Powell · 28.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league33rd percentileHarrison Barnes · 26.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileDennis Smith Jr. · 25.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldAaron HarrisonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league30th percentileDirk Nowitzki · 19.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedStructural team problem19th percentileHarrison Barnes · 32.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem0th percentileDirk Nowitzki · 28.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldAaron HarrisonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league59th percentileDirk Nowitzki · 27.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldAaron HarrisonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Dwight Powell
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

DAL was highly dependent on Dwight Powell. Removing him cost about 28.0% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 5.9 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Wesley Matthews, Harrison Barnes, Salah Mejri, Yogi Ferrell, Dennis Smith Jr.] over 321 possessions.

rotation 42%loses 28.0% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dwight Powell

Wesley Matthews · Harrison Barnes · Salah Mejri · Yogi Ferrell · Dennis Smith Jr.

shrunk net -1.102 over 321 possessions

on floor 2,948 possessions · off floor 4,042 possessions

Harrison Barnes
Single-skill dependence

DAL did not have strong functional backup for Harrison Barnes in interior finish; removing him cost about 26.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Dwight Powell.

rotation 66%loses 26.3% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Harrison Barnes

Dirk Nowitzki · Devin Harris · J.J. Barea · Dwight Powell · Yogi Ferrell

shrunk net 10.143 over 404 possessions

on floor 4,625 possessions · off floor 2,366 possessions

Dennis Smith Jr.
Single-skill dependence

DAL did not have strong functional backup for Dennis Smith Jr. in creation; removing him cost about 26.8% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Wesley Matthews.

rotation 52%loses 26.8% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dennis Smith Jr.

Dirk Nowitzki · Devin Harris · J.J. Barea · Dwight Powell · Yogi Ferrell

shrunk net 10.143 over 404 possessions

on floor 3,686 possessions · off floor 3,305 possessions

Dirk Nowitzki
Single-skill dependence

DAL did not have strong functional backup for Dirk Nowitzki in shooting; removing him cost about 27.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Wesley Matthews.

rotation 48%loses 27.3% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dirk Nowitzki

Wesley Matthews · Harrison Barnes · Dwight Powell · Yogi Ferrell · Dennis Smith Jr.

shrunk net 4.739 over 213 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,455 possessions · off floor 3,536 possessions

Yogi Ferrell
Lineup performance dependence

DAL lineups performed 7.1 points per 100 possessions better with Yogi Ferrell than without him. The best supported alternative was [Dirk Nowitzki, Wesley Matthews, Harrison Barnes, Dennis Smith Jr., Maxi Kleber] over 508 possessions.

rotation 58%loses 21.8% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Yogi Ferrell

Dirk Nowitzki · Wesley Matthews · Harrison Barnes · Dennis Smith Jr. · Maxi Kleber

shrunk net -7.637 over 508 possessions

on floor 3,974 possessions · off floor 3,017 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedSelected player charges appeared below the cap, but holds and incomplete roster charges prevent a clean cap-room claim.
Selected player charges
$81.5M
Share of cap
82%
Tax line
$37.7M under
First apron
$43.7M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 92% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $99,093,000Luxury tax line: $119,266,000First apron: $125,266,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $81,536,345Source-reported payroll: $85,440,245 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.