← Team Metrics
Latest

Dallas Mavericks

2021-22
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Dallas Mavericks in 2021-22, and what needed front-office attention?

DAL 2021-22: the clearest roster problems were Defensive event creation, Rebounding, Rim pressure. The strongest covered areas were Screening. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Jalen Brunson, Dwight Powell, Maxi Kleber, Reggie Bullock. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial9 supported · 2 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Screening
80th percentile
Dwight Powell carries 53.1%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

DAL 2021-22 Screening: this was a team strength, but much of it came from Dwight Powell. Dwight Powell supplied 53.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Defensive event creation
5th percentile
Dorian Finney-Smith carries 36.9%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

DAL 2021-22 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.5 league percentile. Dorian Finney-Smith supplied 36.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Rebounding
5th percentile
Luka Doncic carries 25.9%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

DAL 2021-22 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.5 league percentile. Luka Doncic supplied 25.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Rim pressure
14th percentile
Luka Doncic carries 45.6%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

DAL 2021-22 Rim pressure: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 13.6 league percentile. Luka Doncic supplied 45.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedCritical team problem18th percentileLuka Doncic · 42.1%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem5th percentileDorian Finney-Smith · 36.9%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league36th percentileDwight Powell · 29.7%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem23rd percentileLuka Doncic · 37.7%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDorian Finney-SmithRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem5th percentileLuka Doncic · 25.9%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedCritical team problem14th percentileLuka Doncic · 45.6%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem5th percentileMaxi Kleber · 31.0%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningSupportedTeam strength concentrated in one player80th percentileDwight Powell · 53.1%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league36th percentileDorian Finney-Smith · 33.0%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMaxi KleberRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Jalen Brunson
Single-skill dependence

DAL did not have strong functional backup for Jalen Brunson in creation; removing him cost about 33.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Luka Doncic.

rotation 66%loses 33.4% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jalen Brunson

Reggie Bullock · Spencer Dinwiddie · Dorian Finney-Smith · Maxi Kleber · Luka Doncic

shrunk net 2.65 over 180 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,458 possessions · off floor 2,935 possessions

Dwight Powell
Single-skill dependence

DAL did not have strong functional backup for Dwight Powell in interior finish; removing him cost about 29.7% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Luka Doncic.

rotation 43%loses 29.7% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dwight Powell

Kristaps Porzingis · Dorian Finney-Smith · Maxi Kleber · Jalen Brunson · Luka Doncic

shrunk net 2.688 over 161 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,559 possessions · off floor 4,784 possessions

Maxi Kleber
Single-skill dependence

DAL did not have strong functional backup for Maxi Kleber in rim protection; removing him cost about 31.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Dwight Powell.

rotation 40%loses 31.1% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Maxi Kleber

Reggie Bullock · Dwight Powell · Dorian Finney-Smith · Jalen Brunson · Luka Doncic

shrunk net 7.471 over 907 possessions

on floor 3,263 possessions · off floor 5,120 possessions

Reggie Bullock
Lineup performance dependence

DAL lineups performed 6.1 points per 100 possessions better with Reggie Bullock than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kristaps Porzingis, Dorian Finney-Smith, Maxi Kleber, Jalen Brunson, Luka Doncic] over 161 possessions.

rotation 54%loses 20.0% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Reggie Bullock

Kristaps Porzingis · Dorian Finney-Smith · Maxi Kleber · Jalen Brunson · Luka Doncic

shrunk net 2.688 over 161 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,501 possessions · off floor 3,873 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Tim Hardaway Jr.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$117.3M
Share of cap
104%
Tax line
$19.3M under
First apron
$25.7M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is rebounding. Salary-to-function mapping covers 70% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $112,414,000Luxury tax line: $136,606,000First apron: $143,002,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $117,318,978

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete9 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.