Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
GSW has 2 actionable review nodes with planning anchors. Exact contract deadlines and legal outcomes remain unresolved.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage2 actionable of 4 nodes · 4 planning anchors · 0 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Draymond GreenExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Draymond Green before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Draymond Green would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Draymond Green remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Draymond GreenContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Draymond Green. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Eric PaschallExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Eric Paschall before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Eric Paschall would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Eric Paschall remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Eric PaschallContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Eric Paschall. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 9, 20181 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20201 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jul 8, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20221 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.Draymond GreenExtension review before the contract horizonJul 9, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Eric PaschallExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2021 → Jun 30, 2022
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.