Golden State Warriors
2024-25Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
GSW has 9 actionable review nodes, but 3 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for Gary Payton II before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Kevon Looney before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Gary Payton II. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Kevon Looney. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Brandin Podziemski before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Trayce Jackson-Davis before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Draymond Green before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
The player controls the reported option decision for Draymond Green. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Quinten Post. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Brandin Podziemski. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Draymond Green. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Trayce Jackson-Davis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Quinten Post before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible guarantee structure for Draymond Green. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
What is and is not resolved
The team controls the reported option decision for Trayce Jackson-Davis. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for GSW. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
reported option exposure $27.7M
One review node uses this planning anchor for GSW. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for GSW. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.