← Team Metrics
Latest

Indiana Pacers

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

How much flexibility did the Indiana Pacers actually have in 2016-17?

IND 2016-17 carried $89,226,730 of selected player charges (94.8% of the cap), placing it in under cap on selected player charges. Its highest contracted function cost was passing connectivity at 14.8% of the cap; highest measured need was rim pressure. Exact exception and transaction legality is withheld without team cap-hold and exception-use ledgers.

Current cap position

Current position on selected player charges — not every cap hold or dead-money charge.
SupportedUnder cap on selected player charges
Selected player charges
$89.2M
Share of cap
95%
Tax line
$24.1M under
First apron
$28.1M under
Second apron
No governed line that season
Exact thresholds
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: —Selected player charges: $89,226,730Source-reported payroll: $90,279,072

Option exposure

Optional decisions ahead — reported amounts, not commitments.
Player options (0)
None
Team options (0)
None

Where the money maps

Which basketball functions the payroll is actually buying — shown beside need, never blended.

The largest contracted function cost is passing connectivity at $13.9M; the highest measured need is rim pressure.

0 critical-need functions0 underfunded needs6 redundant-cost functionsmapping covers 94% of charges

Acquisition paths

Threshold candidates only — a candidate route is not exact transaction legality.
Cap room candidate threshold onlyRoom exception candidate threshold onlyMinimum signing
WithheldExact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Cash cost: Withheld — no cash-salary sample.

Selected player charges do not include every cap hold, dead-money charge or roster charge.

Threshold route candidates are not exact transaction legality.

Cash, cap and economic commitment remain separate; no universal flexibility or front-office score.