Indiana Pacers
2016-17Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
IND has 11 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for Jeff Teague before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for CJ Miles before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Paul George before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
The player controls the reported option decision for Rodney Stuckey. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Aaron Brooks. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jeff Teague. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Myles Turner before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Monta Ellis before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Rodney Stuckey before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Glenn Robinson III before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
The player controls the reported option decision for Monta Ellis. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for CJ Miles. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Glenn Robinson III. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Rodney Stuckey. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Al Jefferson before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Al Jefferson. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Monta Ellis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Myles Turner. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Paul George. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Aaron Brooks before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for IND. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
reported option exposure $2.25M
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for IND. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for IND. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
4 review nodes share this planning anchor for IND. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.