← Team Metrics
Latest

Miami Heat

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What are the Miami Heat in 2025-26, and what needs front-office attention?

MIA 2025-26: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection. The strongest covered areas were Creation, Passing connectivity, Interior finishing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Andrew Wiggins, Bam Adebayo, Davion Mitchell. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Creation
92nd percentile
Jaime Jaquez Jr. carries 22.0%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

MIA 2025-26 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 91.7 league percentile. Jaime Jaquez Jr. supplied 22.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Passing connectivity
92nd percentile
Davion Mitchell carries 22.3%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

MIA 2025-26 Passing connectivity: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 91.7 league percentile. Davion Mitchell supplied 22.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Interior finishing
88th percentile
Bam Adebayo carries 19.7%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

MIA 2025-26 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 87.5 league percentile. Bam Adebayo supplied 19.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
13th percentile
Kel'el Ware carries 29.8%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

MIA 2025-26 Rim protection: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 12.5 league percentile. Kel'el Ware supplied 29.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 5 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength92nd percentileJaime Jaquez Jr. · 22.0%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileAndrew Wiggins · 20.6%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength88th percentileBam Adebayo · 19.7%No repeated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength92nd percentileDavion Mitchell · 22.3%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNorman PowellRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk58th percentileBam Adebayo · 40.9%Isolated availability problemCost concentrated in one provider
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength79th percentileBam Adebayo · 23.7%No repeated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem13th percentileKel'el Ware · 29.8%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemUnderfunded structural need
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNorman PowellRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength79th percentileAndrew Wiggins · 26.2%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNorman PowellRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Andrew Wiggins
Single-skill dependence

MIA did not have strong functional backup for Andrew Wiggins in shooting; removing him cost about 26.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Davion Mitchell.

rotation 53%loses 26.1% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Andrew Wiggins

Bam Adebayo · Dru Smith · Nikola Jovic · Jaime Jaquez Jr. · Simone Fontecchio

shrunk net 7.654 over 160 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,119 possessions · off floor 3,635 possessions

Bam Adebayo
Lineup performance dependence

MIA lineups performed 8.9 points per 100 possessions better with Bam Adebayo than without him. The best supported alternative was [Andrew Wiggins, Norman Powell, Davion Mitchell, Jaime Jaquez Jr., Kel'el Ware] over 164 possessions.

rotation 59%loses 19.7% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Bam Adebayo

Andrew Wiggins · Norman Powell · Davion Mitchell · Jaime Jaquez Jr. · Kel'el Ware

shrunk net 2.635 over 164 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,575 possessions · off floor 3,179 possessions

Davion Mitchell
Lineup performance dependence

MIA lineups performed 5.3 points per 100 possessions better with Davion Mitchell than without him. The best supported alternative was [Bam Adebayo, Dru Smith, Nikola Jovic, Jaime Jaquez Jr., Simone Fontecchio] over 160 possessions.

rotation 52%loses 22.3% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Davion Mitchell

Bam Adebayo · Dru Smith · Nikola Jovic · Jaime Jaquez Jr. · Simone Fontecchio

shrunk net 7.654 over 160 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,975 possessions · off floor 3,779 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Dru Smith

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Nikola Jovic

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$157.2M
Share of cap
102%
Tax line
$30.7M under
First apron
$38.8M under
Second apron
$50.7M under

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 100% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $157,151,899Source-reported payroll: $157,325,624 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.