← Team Metrics
Latest

New Orleans Pelicans

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What are the New Orleans Pelicans in 2025-26, and what needs front-office attention?

NOP 2025-26: the clearest roster problems were Passing connectivity, Shooting and spacing. The strongest covered areas were Rim pressure. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Herbert Jones, Yves Missi, Micah Peavy, Karlo Matkovic. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionTax to first apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2026 · 17 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim pressure
96th percentile
Zion Williamson carries 25.8%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

NOP 2025-26 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.8 league percentile. Zion Williamson supplied 25.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 3 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Passing connectivity
17th percentile
Derik Queen carries 18.5%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

NOP 2025-26 Passing connectivity: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 16.7 league percentile. Derik Queen supplied 18.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 7 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Shooting and spacing
13th percentile
Trey Murphy III carries 37.0%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

NOP 2025-26 Shooting and spacing: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 12.5 league percentile. Trey Murphy III supplied 37.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 10 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileZion Williamson · 20.7%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileDerik Queen · 20.3%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileSaddiq Bey · 22.6%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Passing connectivitySupportedCritical team problem17th percentileDerik Queen · 18.5%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKevon LooneyRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileZion Williamson · 24.9%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength96th percentileZion Williamson · 25.8%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileDerik Queen · 32.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKevon LooneyRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedStructural team problem13th percentileTrey Murphy III · 37.0%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemUnderfunded structural need
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKevon LooneyRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Herbert Jones
Lineup performance dependence

NOP lineups performed 5.3 points per 100 possessions better with Herbert Jones than without him. The best supported alternative was [Saddiq Bey, Trey Murphy III, Bryce McGowens, Jeremiah Fears, Derik Queen] over 198 possessions.

rotation 40%loses 19.7% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Herbert Jones

Saddiq Bey · Trey Murphy III · Bryce McGowens · Jeremiah Fears · Derik Queen

shrunk net -5.81 over 198 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,927 possessions · off floor 4,347 possessions

Yves Missi
Lineup performance dependence

NOP lineups performed 3.7 points per 100 possessions better with Yves Missi than without him. The best supported alternative was [Saddiq Bey, Herbert Jones, Trey Murphy III, Jeremiah Fears, Derik Queen] over 222 possessions.

rotation 33%loses 24.6% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Yves Missi

Saddiq Bey · Herbert Jones · Trey Murphy III · Jeremiah Fears · Derik Queen

shrunk net 2.803 over 222 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,287 possessions · off floor 4,987 possessions

Micah Peavy
Lineup performance dependence

NOP lineups performed 3.5 points per 100 possessions better with Micah Peavy than without him. The best supported alternative was [Saddiq Bey, Herbert Jones, Trey Murphy III, Jeremiah Fears, Derik Queen] over 222 possessions.

rotation 23%loses 7.3% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Micah Peavy

Saddiq Bey · Herbert Jones · Trey Murphy III · Jeremiah Fears · Derik Queen

shrunk net 2.803 over 222 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,636 possessions · off floor 5,619 possessions

Karlo Matkovic
Lineup performance dependence

NOP lineups performed 4.3 points per 100 possessions better with Karlo Matkovic than without him. The best supported alternative was [Saddiq Bey, Herbert Jones, Trey Murphy III, Jeremiah Fears, Derik Queen] over 222 possessions.

rotation 23%loses 9.3% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Karlo Matkovic

Saddiq Bey · Herbert Jones · Trey Murphy III · Jeremiah Fears · Derik Queen

shrunk net 2.803 over 222 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,614 possessions · off floor 5,641 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Trey Murphy III

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Saddiq Bey

Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 7 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Zion Williamson

Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 7 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Herbert Jones

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 7 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Zion Williamson

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 6 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Yves Missi

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Zion Williamson

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 · strength at risk in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Zion Williamson

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was in the tax but below the first apron on selected player charges.
Selected player charges
$191.2M
Share of cap
124%
Tax line
$3.30M over
First apron
$4.75M under
Second apron
$16.6M under

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is passing connectivity. Salary-to-function mapping covers 97% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $191,196,562Source-reported payroll: $190,898,076 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.