As ofLatest

New York Knicks

2017-18

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

Latest available releaseLive database

Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?

NYK has 6 actionable review nodes, but 3 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.

PartialPartial contract identity coverage6 actionable of 13 nodes · 10 planning anchors · 3 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported

The decision map

Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.

Jul 30, 2017

Kristaps PorzingisExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Kristaps Porzingis before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Kristaps Porzingis would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Kristaps Porzingis remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Jun 30, 2018

2 decisions share this date

Jarrett JackContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jarrett Jack. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy

Michael BeasleyContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Michael Beasley. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Jul 8, 2018

2 decisions share this date

Courtney LeeExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Courtney Lee before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Courtney Lee would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Courtney Lee remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Lance ThomasExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Lance Thomas before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Lance Thomas would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Lance Thomas remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Jun 30, 2019

Kristaps PorzingisContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Kristaps Porzingis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Jun 30, 2020

2 decisions share this date

Courtney LeeContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Courtney Lee. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Lance ThomasContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Lance Thomas. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Jun 30, 2021

2 decisions share this date

Frank NtilikinaContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Frank Ntilikina. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Tim Hardaway Jr.Contract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Tim Hardaway Jr.. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

No supported date

3 decisions share this date

Jarrett JackExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Jarrett Jack before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Jarrett Jack would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Jarrett Jack remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Michael BeasleyExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Michael Beasley before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Michael Beasley would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Michael Beasley remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Jarrett JackGuarantee reviewGuarantee structure review exact decision date unavailableTeam subject to contract terms decide

Review the visible guarantee structure for Jarrett Jack. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.

Guarantee or reported schedule continuesWaive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Withheld — Exact guarantee decision date unresolvedCBA legality: Exact guarantee mechanism date waiver and stretch rules unresolvedMarket price: Not market evidenceSalary input: Reported schedule visible guarantee timing unresolvedDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Guarantee or reported schedule continues”: The reported schedule for Jarrett Jack is preserved subject to the guarantee source limits.If “Waive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state”: A waiver or conversion path for Jarrett Jack cannot be priced without the exact guarantee date and applicable CBA mechanics.

Shared planning dates

Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.

Jul 30, 20171 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20182 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NYK. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jul 8, 20182 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NYK. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jun 30, 20191 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20202 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NYK. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jun 30, 20212 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NYK. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Connected decisions

Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.

Kristaps PorzingisExtension review before the contract horizonJul 30, 2017 → Jun 30, 2019

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Courtney LeeExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Lance ThomasExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2018 → Jun 30, 2020

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Jarrett JackExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2018

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Michael BeasleyExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2018

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Jarrett JackGuarantee review before contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2018

The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.

Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.

A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.

Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.

Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.

Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.

Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.