Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
NYK has 6 actionable review nodes, but 2 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
PartialPartial contract identity coverage6 actionable of 11 nodes · 9 planning anchors · 2 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Julius RandleExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Julius Randle before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Julius Randle would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Julius Randle remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Julius RandleContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Julius Randle. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Taj GibsonContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decideReview the visible contract-control boundary for Taj Gibson. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Aug 17, 2023
2 decisions share this date
Alec BurksExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Alec Burks before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Alec Burks would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Alec Burks remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Derrick RoseExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decideReview a possible extension path for Derrick Rose before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Derrick Rose would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Derrick Rose remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Evan FournierTeam option decisionOutside date available; the contract's own deadline is unresolvedTeam decidesThe team controls the reported option decision for Evan Fournier. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
Decline the reported optionExercise the reported option
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Option outside date visible reported salary unavailableCBA legality: Option owner visible exact contract deadline and cap treatment unresolvedMarket price: Decline branch market price unresolvedSalary input: Reported option salary unavailableDate basis: CBA outside date — not a contract-specific deadlineIf “Decline the reported option”: Evan Fournier leaves the reported option salary schedule. Cap holds, rights, replacement cost, roster plan and market price remain unresolved.If “Exercise the reported option”: Evan Fournier remains on the reported option salary input. The team must still recalculate future cap, apron and roster effects.
Jun 30, 2024
2 decisions share this date
Alec BurksContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Alec Burks. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Derrick RoseContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Derrick Rose. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Evan FournierContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide Review the visible contract-control boundary for Evan Fournier. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
No supported date
2 decisions share this date
Taj GibsonExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide Review a possible extension path for Taj Gibson before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Taj Gibson would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Taj Gibson remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Julius RandleGuarantee reviewGuarantee structure review exact decision date unavailableTeam subject to contract terms decide Review the visible guarantee structure for Julius Randle. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
Guarantee or reported schedule continuesWaive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state
+What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Exact guarantee decision date unresolvedCBA legality: Exact guarantee mechanism date waiver and stretch rules unresolvedMarket price: Not market evidenceSalary input: Reported schedule visible guarantee timing unresolvedDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Guarantee or reported schedule continues”: The reported schedule for Julius Randle is preserved subject to the guarantee source limits.If “Waive, convert or otherwise change the guarantee state”: A waiver or conversion path for Julius Randle cannot be priced without the exact guarantee date and applicable CBA mechanics.
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.Jul 8, 20211 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20221 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20231 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Aug 17, 20232 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NYK. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jun 29, 20241 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Jun 30, 20242 decisions · 2 players
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NYK. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Jun 30, 20251 decision · 1 player
One review node uses this planning anchor for NYK. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.Julius RandleExtension review before the contract horizonJul 8, 2021 → Jun 30, 2022
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Alec BurksExtension review before the contract horizonAug 17, 2023 → Jun 30, 2024
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Derrick RoseExtension review before the contract horizonAug 17, 2023 → Jun 30, 2024
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Evan FournierOption controls contract horizon stateJun 29, 2024 → Jun 30, 2025
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
Taj GibsonExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2023
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Julius RandleGuarantee review before contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2022
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.
