← Team Metrics
Latest

Oklahoma City Thunder

2018-19
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Oklahoma City Thunder in 2018-19, and what needed front-office attention?

OKC 2018-19: the clearest roster problems were Rebounding. The strongest covered areas were Defensive event creation, Rim pressure, Rim protection. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Paul George, Russell Westbrook. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionAt or above first apron no second apron threshold
Next decision dateJun 29, 2019 · 7 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Defensive event creation
95th percentile
Paul George carries 26.6%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

OKC 2018-19 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.2 league percentile. Paul George supplied 26.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim pressure
91st percentile
Paul George carries 25.6%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

OKC 2018-19 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 90.5 league percentile. Paul George supplied 25.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim protection
91st percentile
Steven Adams carries 29.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

OKC 2018-19 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 90.5 league percentile. Steven Adams supplied 29.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rebounding
19th percentile
Paul George carries 27.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

OKC 2018-19 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 19.0 league percentile. Paul George supplied 27.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk29th percentileRussell Westbrook · 40.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength95th percentilePaul George · 26.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league71st percentileJerami Grant · 27.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league38th percentileRussell Westbrook · 39.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRaymond FeltonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem19th percentilePaul George · 27.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength91st percentilePaul George · 25.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength91st percentileSteven Adams · 29.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRaymond FeltonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league52nd percentilePaul George · 39.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRaymond FeltonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Paul George
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

OKC was highly dependent on Paul George. Removing him cost about 26.6% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 13.3 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Russell Westbrook, Dennis Schroder, Steven Adams, Jerami Grant, Terrance Ferguson] over 368 possessions.

rotation 72%loses 26.6% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Paul George

Russell Westbrook · Dennis Schroder · Steven Adams · Jerami Grant · Terrance Ferguson

shrunk net 0.207 over 368 possessions

on floor 5,819 possessions · off floor 2,156 possessions

Russell Westbrook
Single-skill dependence

OKC did not have strong functional backup for Russell Westbrook in passing; removing him cost about 39.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Paul George.

rotation 67%loses 39.6% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Russell Westbrook

Paul George · Dennis Schroder · Steven Adams · Jerami Grant · Terrance Ferguson

shrunk net 7.95 over 267 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,392 possessions · off floor 2,582 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe financial threshold state is era-specific and must be read with the underlying rules.
Selected player charges
$144.9M
Share of cap
142%
Tax line
$21.2M over
First apron
$15.1M over
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to defensive event creation; the highest-need area is rebounding. Salary-to-function mapping covers 91% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $101,869,000Luxury tax line: $123,733,000First apron: $129,817,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $144,916,427Source-reported payroll: $144,916,427 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.