Portland Trail Blazers
2017-18Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
POR has 7 actionable review nodes with planning anchors. Exact contract deadlines and legal outcomes remain unresolved.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for Shabazz Napier before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Jusuf Nurkic before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Al-Farouq Aminu before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Ed Davis before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
The player controls the reported option decision for Al-Farouq Aminu. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Ed Davis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jusuf Nurkic. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Shabazz Napier. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Evan Turner before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Pat Connaughton before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Al-Farouq Aminu. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Pat Connaughton. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Evan Turner. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for CJ McCollum. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Damian Lillard. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Zach Collins. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for POR. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
reported option exposure $6.96M
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for POR. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for POR. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for POR. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.