As ofLatest

Portland Trail Blazers

2022-23

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

Latest available releaseLive database

Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?

POR has 2 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.

PartialPartial contract identity coverage2 actionable of 6 nodes · 5 planning anchors · 1 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported

The decision map

Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.

Nov 22, 2022

Jerami GrantExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Jerami Grant before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Jerami Grant would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Jerami Grant remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Jun 30, 2023

2 decisions share this date

Jerami GrantContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jerami Grant. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy

Justise WinslowContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Justise Winslow. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Jun 30, 2026

2 decisions share this date

Anfernee SimonsContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Anfernee Simons. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

Jusuf NurkicContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jusuf Nurkic. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved

No supported date

Justise WinslowExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Justise Winslow before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon

What is and is not resolved

Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Justise Winslow would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Justise Winslow remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Shared planning dates

Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.

Nov 22, 20221 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for POR. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20232 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for POR. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jun 30, 20262 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for POR. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Connected decisions

Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.

Jerami GrantExtension review before the contract horizonNov 22, 2022 → Jun 30, 2023

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Justise WinslowExtension review before the contract horizonno date → Jun 30, 2023

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.

A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.

Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.

Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.

Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.

Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.