← Team Metrics
Latest

Portland Trail Blazers

2023-24
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Portland Trail Blazers in 2023-24, and what needed front-office attention?

POR 2023-24: the clearest roster problems were Rim pressure, Shooting and spacing, Interior finishing. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Scoot Henderson, Jabari Walker, Matisse Thybulle, Toumani Camara, Kris Murray. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — full situation-room coverage available.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim pressure
4th percentile
Jerami Grant carries 20.3%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

POR 2023-24 Rim pressure: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.3 league percentile. Jerami Grant supplied 20.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 9 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Shooting and spacing
4th percentile
Anfernee Simons carries 28.9%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

POR 2023-24 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.3 league percentile. Anfernee Simons supplied 28.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 9 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Interior finishing
13th percentile
Deandre Ayton carries 25.6%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

POR 2023-24 Interior finishing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 13.0 league percentile. Deandre Ayton supplied 25.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 9 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedStructural team problem0th percentileScoot Henderson · 25.9%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league52nd percentileMatisse Thybulle · 27.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedCritical team problem13th percentileDeandre Ayton · 25.6%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem0th percentileScoot Henderson · 24.5%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDeandre AytonRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk30th percentileDeandre Ayton · 44.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileJerami Grant · 20.3%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem9th percentileDeandre Ayton · 23.2%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDeandre AytonRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileAnfernee Simons · 28.9%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDeandre AytonRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Scoot Henderson
Single-skill dependence

POR did not have strong functional backup for Scoot Henderson in creation; removing him cost about 25.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Anfernee Simons.

rotation 45%loses 25.9% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Scoot Henderson

Jerami Grant · Malcolm Brogdon · Anfernee Simons · Deandre Ayton · Jabari Walker

shrunk net -1.493 over 159 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,182 possessions · off floor 3,830 possessions

Jabari Walker
Single-skill dependence

POR did not have strong functional backup for Jabari Walker in rebounding; removing him cost about 31.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Deandre Ayton.

rotation 43%loses 31.3% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jabari Walker

Jerami Grant · Malcolm Brogdon · Deandre Ayton · Shaedon Sharpe · Toumani Camara

shrunk net -3.608 over 195 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,985 possessions · off floor 4,027 possessions

Matisse Thybulle
Single-skill dependence

POR did not have strong functional backup for Matisse Thybulle in event creation; removing him cost about 27.5% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Toumani Camara.

rotation 37%loses 27.5% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Matisse Thybulle

Jerami Grant · Malcolm Brogdon · Anfernee Simons · Deandre Ayton · Jabari Walker

shrunk net -1.493 over 159 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,590 possessions · off floor 4,422 possessions

Toumani Camara
Lineup performance dependence

POR lineups performed 8.1 points per 100 possessions better with Toumani Camara than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jerami Grant, Malcolm Brogdon, Anfernee Simons, Deandre Ayton, Jabari Walker] over 159 possessions.

rotation 44%loses 20.7% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Toumani Camara

Jerami Grant · Malcolm Brogdon · Anfernee Simons · Deandre Ayton · Jabari Walker

shrunk net -1.493 over 159 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,076 possessions · off floor 3,936 possessions

Kris Murray
Lineup performance dependence

POR lineups performed 5.1 points per 100 possessions better with Kris Murray than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jerami Grant, Malcolm Brogdon, Anfernee Simons, Deandre Ayton, Jabari Walker] over 159 possessions.

rotation 34%loses 15.3% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kris Murray

Jerami Grant · Malcolm Brogdon · Anfernee Simons · Deandre Ayton · Jabari Walker

shrunk net -1.493 over 159 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,386 possessions · off floor 4,626 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Scoot Henderson

Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Matisse Thybulle

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Deandre Ayton

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Scoot Henderson

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Deandre Ayton

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jerami Grant

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Deandre Ayton

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 9 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Anfernee Simons

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$165.3M
Share of cap
121%
Tax line
$30K under
First apron
$7.08M under
Second apron
$17.5M under

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 95% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $136,021,000Luxury tax line: $165,294,000First apron: $172,346,000Second apron: $182,794,000Selected player charges: $165,263,993Source-reported payroll: $165,263,993 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.