← Team Metrics
Latest

Portland Trail Blazers

2025-26
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What are the Portland Trail Blazers in 2025-26, and what needs front-office attention?

POR 2025-26: the clearest roster problems were Defensive event creation. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Jrue Holiday, Kris Murray, Robert Williams III. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionFirst to second apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Defensive event creation
17th percentile
Shaedon Sharpe carries 16.9%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

POR 2025-26 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 16.7 league percentile. Shaedon Sharpe supplied 16.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league38th percentileDeni Avdija · 28.7%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem17th percentileShaedon Sharpe · 16.9%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league33rd percentileDonovan Clingan · 26.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileDeni Avdija · 29.1%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRobert Williams IIIRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league54th percentileDonovan Clingan · 28.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileDeni Avdija · 24.6%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileDonovan Clingan · 35.8%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRobert Williams IIIRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileJerami Grant · 23.9%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRobert Williams IIIRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Jrue Holiday
Lineup performance dependence

POR lineups performed 7.7 points per 100 possessions better with Jrue Holiday than without him. The best supported alternative was [Deni Avdija, Shaedon Sharpe, Kris Murray, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan] over 206 possessions.

rotation 42%loses 22.7% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jrue Holiday

Deni Avdija · Shaedon Sharpe · Kris Murray · Toumani Camara · Donovan Clingan

shrunk net 1.112 over 206 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,348 possessions · off floor 4,475 possessions

Kris Murray
Lineup performance dependence

POR lineups performed 4.9 points per 100 possessions better with Kris Murray than without him. The best supported alternative was [Jrue Holiday, Deni Avdija, Scoot Henderson, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan] over 279 possessions.

rotation 32%loses 14.0% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kris Murray

Jrue Holiday · Deni Avdija · Scoot Henderson · Toumani Camara · Donovan Clingan

shrunk net 0.085 over 279 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,497 possessions · off floor 5,326 possessions

Robert Williams III
Lineup performance dependence

POR lineups performed 3.9 points per 100 possessions better with Robert Williams III than without him. The best supported alternative was [Deni Avdija, Shaedon Sharpe, Kris Murray, Toumani Camara, Donovan Clingan] over 206 possessions.

rotation 27%loses 25.3% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Robert Williams III

Deni Avdija · Shaedon Sharpe · Kris Murray · Toumani Camara · Donovan Clingan

shrunk net 1.112 over 206 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,011 possessions · off floor 5,812 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Shaedon Sharpe

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jerami Grant

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jerami Grant

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Shaedon Sharpe

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Jerami Grant

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was operating in a first-apron restricted state.
Selected player charges
$196.5M
Share of cap
127%
Tax line
$8.64M over
First apron
$588K over
Second apron
$11.3M under

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 73% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $154,647,000Luxury tax line: $187,895,000First apron: $195,945,000Second apron: $207,824,000Selected player charges: $196,533,012Source-reported payroll: $189,204,726 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.