Sacramento Kings
2018-19Which players deserved investigation for the Sacramento Kings’ problems in 2018-19?
Feb 7, 2019 — Vlade Divac
The decision this board surrounds ultimately brought in Caleb Swanigan. Later outcomes never rewrite the board.SAC on 2019-02-07: the listed basketball needs were rim pressure, passing, rim protection. 1 candidate(s) had a source directly linking them to the team. 3 open-market candidate(s) matched at least one listed need. Market access, basketball fit, price, salary route, and legality remain separate.
Marc Gasolcap charge $24.1MWhy is he here?
Marc Gasol: a source directly linked Marc Gasol to SAC. His prior basketball profile addressed one listed need: rim_protection. The minimum outgoing-salary screen was available for a $24,119,025 incoming charge. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
minimum outgoing salary screen only; post-trade team salary, guarantees, bonuses, aggregation timing, exceptions and complete package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: -1.0 per 100 (O -0.8 / D -0.2) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
JaMychal Greencap charge $8.07MWhy is he here?
JaMychal Green: JaMychal Green was on the public trade market, but no source linked SAC to him. His prior basketball profile addressed one listed need: rim_pressure. The minimum outgoing-salary screen was available for a $8,066,667 incoming charge. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
minimum outgoing salary screen only; post-trade team salary, guarantees, bonuses, aggregation timing, exceptions and complete package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: -0.3 per 100 (O -0.0 / D -0.2) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
Garrett Templecap charge $8.00MWhy is he here?
Garrett Temple: Garrett Temple was on the public trade market, but no source linked SAC to him. His prior basketball profile addressed one listed need: passing. The salary screen was available, but contract-control records were ambiguous. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
minimum outgoing salary screen only; post-trade team salary, guarantees, bonuses, aggregation timing, exceptions and complete package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: -1.0 per 100 (O -0.9 / D -0.1) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
Avery Bradleycap charge $12.0MWhy is he here?
Avery Bradley: Avery Bradley was on the public trade market, but no source linked SAC to him. His strongest observed functions did not match the listed top needs. The minimum outgoing-salary screen was available for a $12,000,000 incoming charge. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
minimum outgoing salary screen only; post-trade team salary, guarantees, bonuses, aggregation timing, exceptions and complete package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: -0.3 per 100 (O 0.0 / D -0.3) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
Markelle Fultzcap charge $8.34MWhy is he here?
Markelle Fultz: sources linked Markelle Fultz to another team, not SAC. His prior basketball profile addressed one listed need: passing. The minimum outgoing-salary screen was available for a $8,339,880 incoming charge. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
minimum outgoing salary screen only; post-trade team salary, guarantees, bonuses, aggregation timing, exceptions and complete package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: 0.5 per 100 (O -0.0 / D 0.5) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
Historical decision board. A public-market player is not presented as a team target without a named team link. Minimum outgoing salary is not exact legality. Missing asking price is not a zero price. Later outcomes do not alter the decision-date board.