← Team Metrics
Latest

Sacramento Kings

2022-23
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Sacramento Kings in 2022-23, and what needed front-office attention?

SAC 2022-23: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection. The strongest covered areas were Rim pressure, Creation, Interior finishing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Domantas Sabonis, De'Aaron Fox, Chimezie Metu. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2023 · 8 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim pressure
100th percentile
De'Aaron Fox carries 23.4%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAC 2022-23 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. De'Aaron Fox supplied 23.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Creation
96th percentile
De'Aaron Fox carries 31.1%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAC 2022-23 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.7 league percentile. De'Aaron Fox supplied 31.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Interior finishing
96th percentile
Domantas Sabonis carries 23.7%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAC 2022-23 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.7 league percentile. Domantas Sabonis supplied 23.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
13th percentile
Domantas Sabonis carries 33.0%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAC 2022-23 Rim protection: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 13.0 league percentile. Domantas Sabonis supplied 33.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength96th percentileDe'Aaron Fox · 31.1%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league26th percentileKevin Huerter · 27.4%Isolated availability problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength96th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 23.7%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength87th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 30.3%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDavion MitchellRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength87th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 23.5%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength100th percentileDe'Aaron Fox · 23.4%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedCritical team problem13th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 33.0%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDomantas SabonisRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileKevin Huerter · 23.5%Isolated availability problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDavion MitchellRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Domantas Sabonis
Single-skill dependence

SAC did not have strong functional backup for Domantas Sabonis in passing; removing him cost about 30.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was De'Aaron Fox.

rotation 69%loses 30.3% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Domantas Sabonis

Harrison Barnes · Trey Lyles · De'Aaron Fox · Malik Monk · Chimezie Metu

shrunk net 3.898 over 167 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,408 possessions · off floor 2,429 possessions

De'Aaron Fox
Single-skill dependence

SAC did not have strong functional backup for De'Aaron Fox in creation; removing him cost about 31.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Domantas Sabonis.

rotation 63%loses 31.1% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without De'Aaron Fox

Harrison Barnes · Domantas Sabonis · Kevin Huerter · Davion Mitchell · Keegan Murray

shrunk net 5.449 over 498 possessions

on floor 5,021 possessions · off floor 2,816 possessions

Chimezie Metu
Lineup performance dependence

SAC lineups performed 4.1 points per 100 possessions better with Chimezie Metu than without him. The best supported alternative was [Harrison Barnes, Domantas Sabonis, Kevin Huerter, Davion Mitchell, Keegan Murray] over 498 possessions.

rotation 16%loses 5.9% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Chimezie Metu

Harrison Barnes · Domantas Sabonis · Kevin Huerter · Davion Mitchell · Keegan Murray

shrunk net 5.449 over 498 possessions

on floor 1,301 possessions · off floor 6,536 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

Recent availability did not create a repeated team-level problem in the covered window.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$139.4M
Share of cap
113%
Tax line
$10.9M under
First apron
$17.6M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 98% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $123,655,000Luxury tax line: $150,267,000First apron: $156,983,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $139,373,615Source-reported payroll: $139,423,615 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.