← Team Metrics
Latest

Sacramento Kings

2019-20
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Sacramento Kings in 2019-20, and what needed front-office attention?

SAC 2019-20: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection, Rebounding. The strongest covered areas were Creation, Passing connectivity, Shooting and spacing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Buddy Hield, Nemanja Bjelica, Cory Joseph, Richaun Holmes. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2020 · 7 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Creation
92nd percentile
De'Aaron Fox carries 22.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAC 2019-20 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 92.3 league percentile. De'Aaron Fox supplied 22.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Passing connectivity
92nd percentile
De'Aaron Fox carries 20.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAC 2019-20 Passing connectivity: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 92.3 league percentile. De'Aaron Fox supplied 20.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Shooting and spacing
81st percentile
Buddy Hield carries 28.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAC 2019-20 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 80.8 league percentile. Buddy Hield supplied 28.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
0th percentile
Richaun Holmes carries 47.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAC 2019-20 Rim protection: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Richaun Holmes supplied 47.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Rebounding
4th percentile
Nemanja Bjelica carries 50.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAC 2019-20 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 3.8 league percentile. Nemanja Bjelica supplied 50.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength92nd percentileDe'Aaron Fox · 22.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileDe'Aaron Fox · 23.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league62nd percentileHarrison Barnes · 26.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength92nd percentileDe'Aaron Fox · 20.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRichaun HolmesNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileNemanja Bjelica · 50.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileHarrison Barnes · 29.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileRichaun Holmes · 47.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRichaun HolmesNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength81st percentileBuddy Hield · 28.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldRichaun HolmesNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Buddy Hield
Single-skill dependence

SAC did not have strong functional backup for Buddy Hield in shooting; removing him cost about 28.8% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Nemanja Bjelica.

rotation 63%loses 28.8% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Buddy Hield

Nemanja Bjelica · Harrison Barnes · Bogdan Bogdanovic · De'Aaron Fox · Harry Giles III

shrunk net -8.138 over 256 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,971 possessions · off floor 2,267 possessions

Nemanja Bjelica
Single-skill dependence

SAC did not have strong functional backup for Nemanja Bjelica in shooting; removing him cost about 26.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Buddy Hield.

rotation 57%loses 26.4% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Nemanja Bjelica

Cory Joseph · Harrison Barnes · Bogdan Bogdanovic · Richaun Holmes · Buddy Hield

shrunk net 1.179 over 161 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,572 possessions · off floor 2,662 possessions

Cory Joseph
Lineup performance dependence

SAC lineups performed 4.1 points per 100 possessions better with Cory Joseph than without him. The best supported alternative was [Nemanja Bjelica, Harrison Barnes, Richaun Holmes, Buddy Hield, De'Aaron Fox] over 334 possessions.

rotation 50%loses 18.5% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Cory Joseph

Nemanja Bjelica · Harrison Barnes · Richaun Holmes · Buddy Hield · De'Aaron Fox

shrunk net 0.918 over 334 possessions

on floor 3,105 possessions · off floor 3,135 possessions

Richaun Holmes
Lineup performance dependence

SAC lineups performed 4.2 points per 100 possessions better with Richaun Holmes than without him. The best supported alternative was [Nemanja Bjelica, Harrison Barnes, Bogdan Bogdanovic, De'Aaron Fox, Harry Giles III] over 256 possessions.

rotation 36%loses 16.8% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Richaun Holmes

Nemanja Bjelica · Harrison Barnes · Bogdan Bogdanovic · De'Aaron Fox · Harry Giles III

shrunk net -8.138 over 256 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,253 possessions · off floor 4,010 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$113.8M
Share of cap
104%
Tax line
$18.8M under
First apron
$25.1M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is rim protection. Salary-to-function mapping covers 74% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $109,140,000Luxury tax line: $132,627,000First apron: $138,928,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $113,796,966Source-reported payroll: $113,796,966 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.