Gingeball

League Board

Which teams have the most open conditional paths — and how much still needs a dated test?

As ofLatest

Decision volume Planning windows Sequencing workload Keep/exit optionality Competitive window

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

sorted by open paths · click a column to re-sort · click a team for its workspace · open a row for why it is here

Team	Branches	Open paths	Needs planning	Needs evidence	Needs dated test	Path abstentions	Basketball gaps
ORL ORL has 32 conditional decision branches and 25 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	32	25	6	39	32	33	4
HOU HOU has 30 conditional decision branches and 23 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	30	23	6	37	30	31	4
OKC OKC has 28 conditional decision branches and 22 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	28	22	4	34	28	30	10
UTA UTA has 30 conditional decision branches and 21 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	30	21	5	39	30	34	18
TOR TOR has 22 conditional decision branches and 19 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	22	19	2	3	22	45	8
DET DET has 20 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	20	18	2	22	20	20	0
MIA MIA has 22 conditional decision branches and 18 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	22	18	4	4	22	44	4
DAL DAL has 20 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	20	17	0	3	20	43	10
DEN DEN has 20 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	20	17	3	23	20	20	0
CLE CLE has 18 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	16	1	20	18	19	4
LAC LAC has 18 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	16	1	20	18	19	6
BRK BRK has 18 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	15	0	21	18	21	18
GSW GSW has 18 conditional decision branches and 15 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	15	1	3	18	38	8
BOS BOS has 16 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	16	14	2	2	16	32	0
CHI CHI has 16 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	14	2	18	16	16	2
NOP NOP has 18 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	14	4	22	18	18	0
CHO CHO has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	14	13	1	1	14	28	6
IND IND has 16 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	13	3	19	16	16	0
LAL LAL has 16 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	13	0	19	16	19	16
MIL MIL has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:First apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	13	1	15	14	14	0
NYK NYK has 16 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	13	2	19	16	17	2
POR POR has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	11	1	13	12	12	2
PHX PHX has 14 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	14	10	4	4	14	28	2
SAS SAS has 12 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	10	2	14	12	12	2
MEM MEM has 10 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	8	0	12	10	12	6
SAC SAC has 8 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	8	6	0	10	8	10	8
ATL ATL has 6 conditional decision branches and 5 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	6	5	0	7	6	7	6
MIN MIN has 6 conditional decision branches and 5 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Second apron pressure review triggeredDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	6	5	1	1	6	12	0
WAS WAS has 4 conditional decision branches and 4 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	4	0	4	4	4	4
PHI PHI has no actionable option, extension or guarantee branches to map. Coverage:WithheldWithheld — No governed core playersCap context:Tax pressure review triggeredDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

League rows compare evidence coverage and conditional path counts, not team quality or front-office success.