Oklahoma City Thunder
2024-25Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
OKC has 14 actionable review nodes, but 4 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for Alex Caruso before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Jalen Williams before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Kenrich Williams before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Alex Caruso. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jaylin Williams. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Luguentz Dort before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Cason Wallace before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
The team controls the reported option decision for Isaiah Hartenstein. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
The team controls the reported option decision for Kenrich Williams. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
The team controls the reported option decision for Luguentz Dort. The displayed date, if any, is not a contract-specific deadline.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jalen Williams. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Isaiah Hartenstein before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Cason Wallace. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Isaiah Hartenstein. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Kenrich Williams. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Luguentz Dort. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Jaylin Williams before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible guarantee structure for Isaiah Hartenstein. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible guarantee structure for Jaylin Williams. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible guarantee structure for Luguentz Dort. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for OKC. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for OKC. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
reported option exposure $51.7M
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
5 review nodes share this planning anchor for OKC. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The reported option controls whether the same player and contract continue into the visible horizon state. Exact contract timing and downstream rights remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.