← Team Metrics
Latest

Chicago Bulls

2017-18
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Chicago Bulls in 2017-18, and what needed front-office attention?

CHI 2017-18: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection, Shooting and spacing, Rim pressure. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Denzel Valentine, Robin Lopez, Kris Dunn, Justin Holiday, Bobby Portis. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionUnder cap on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
7th percentile
Robin Lopez carries 31.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

CHI 2017-18 Rim protection: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 7.4 league percentile. Robin Lopez supplied 31.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Shooting and spacing
22nd percentile
Denzel Valentine carries 35.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

CHI 2017-18 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 22.2 league percentile. Denzel Valentine supplied 35.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Rim pressure
15th percentile
David Nwaba carries 25.5%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

CHI 2017-18 Rim pressure: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 14.8 league percentile. David Nwaba supplied 25.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league63rd percentileDenzel Valentine · 28.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league37th percentileKris Dunn · 26.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league52nd percentileLauri Markkanen · 19.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league70th percentileDenzel Valentine · 27.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldCameron PayneNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league59th percentileLauri Markkanen · 28.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedStructural team problem15th percentileDavid Nwaba · 25.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedCritical team problem7th percentileRobin Lopez · 31.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldCameron PayneNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem22nd percentileDenzel Valentine · 35.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldCameron PayneNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Denzel Valentine
Single-skill dependence

CHI did not have strong functional backup for Denzel Valentine in passing; removing him cost about 27.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jerian Grant.

rotation 53%loses 27.1% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Denzel Valentine

Robin Lopez · Justin Holiday · Jerian Grant · David Nwaba · Lauri Markkanen

shrunk net 2.281 over 158 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,803 possessions · off floor 3,447 possessions

Robin Lopez
Single-skill dependence

CHI did not have strong functional backup for Robin Lopez in rim protection; removing him cost about 31.7% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Lauri Markkanen.

rotation 42%loses 31.6% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Robin Lopez

Nikola Mirotic · Jerian Grant · Bobby Portis · Paul Zipser · David Nwaba

shrunk net 0.094 over 204 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,079 possessions · off floor 4,171 possessions

Kris Dunn
Single-skill dependence

CHI did not have strong functional backup for Kris Dunn in event creation; removing him cost about 26.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Justin Holiday.

rotation 38%loses 26.1% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kris Dunn

Robin Lopez · Justin Holiday · Jerian Grant · David Nwaba · Lauri Markkanen

shrunk net 2.281 over 158 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,814 possessions · off floor 4,436 possessions

Justin Holiday
Lineup performance dependence

CHI lineups performed 4.4 points per 100 possessions better with Justin Holiday than without him. The best supported alternative was [Nikola Mirotic, Jerian Grant, Bobby Portis, Paul Zipser, David Nwaba] over 204 possessions.

rotation 57%loses 18.5% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Justin Holiday

Nikola Mirotic · Jerian Grant · Bobby Portis · Paul Zipser · David Nwaba

shrunk net 0.094 over 204 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,164 possessions · off floor 3,086 possessions

Bobby Portis
Lineup performance dependence

CHI lineups performed 9.2 points per 100 possessions better with Bobby Portis than without him. The best supported alternative was [Robin Lopez, Justin Holiday, Jerian Grant, David Nwaba, Lauri Markkanen] over 158 possessions.

rotation 41%loses 18.7% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Bobby Portis

Robin Lopez · Justin Holiday · Jerian Grant · David Nwaba · Lauri Markkanen

shrunk net 2.281 over 158 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,019 possessions · off floor 4,231 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedSelected player charges appeared below the cap, but holds and incomplete roster charges prevent a clean cap-room claim.
Selected player charges
$90.4M
Share of cap
91%
Tax line
$28.9M under
First apron
$34.9M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 57% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $99,093,000Luxury tax line: $119,266,000First apron: $125,266,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $90,379,250Source-reported payroll: $90,466,801 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.