← Team Metrics
Latest

Chicago Bulls

2023-24
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Chicago Bulls in 2023-24, and what needed front-office attention?

CHI 2023-24: the clearest roster problems were Rim pressure, Interior finishing. The strongest covered areas were Defensive event creation, Creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Alex Caruso, Andre Drummond, Jevon Carter, Dalen Terry, Patrick Williams. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoverageSupported8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionTax to first apron on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2024 · 9 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Defensive event creation
83rd percentile
Alex Caruso carries 28.0%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

CHI 2023-24 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 82.6 league percentile. Alex Caruso supplied 28.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 4 of the final 10 covered games. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Creation
78th percentile
DeMar DeRozan carries 38.3%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

CHI 2023-24 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 78.3 league percentile. DeMar DeRozan supplied 38.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 5 of the final 10 covered games. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim pressure
0th percentile
DeMar DeRozan carries 64.1%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

CHI 2023-24 Rim pressure: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. DeMar DeRozan supplied 64.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Interior finishing
4th percentile
DeMar DeRozan carries 32.7%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

CHI 2023-24 Interior finishing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.3 league percentile. DeMar DeRozan supplied 32.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 4 of the final 10 covered games. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength78th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 38.3%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileAlex Caruso · 28.0%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 32.7%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league35th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 35.1%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNikola VucevicRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk65th percentileNikola Vucevic · 42.6%Absences repeatedly created a problemCost concentrated in one provider
Rim pressureSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 64.1%Isolated availability problemComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league44th percentileNikola Vucevic · 24.7%Absences repeatedly created a problemHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNikola VucevicRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league48th percentileAlex Caruso · 25.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNikola VucevicRecent availability conclusion withheldBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Alex Caruso
Single-skill dependence

CHI did not have strong functional backup for Alex Caruso in event creation; removing him cost about 28.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Andre Drummond.

rotation 51%loses 28.0% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Alex Caruso

DeMar DeRozan · Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Patrick Williams · Ayo Dosunmu

shrunk net 2.492 over 244 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,774 possessions · off floor 3,465 possessions

Andre Drummond
Single-skill dependence

CHI did not have strong functional backup for Andre Drummond in rebounding; removing him cost about 29.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Nikola Vucevic.

rotation 33%loses 29.1% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Andre Drummond

DeMar DeRozan · Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Patrick Williams · Ayo Dosunmu

shrunk net 2.492 over 244 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,353 possessions · off floor 4,902 possessions

Jevon Carter
Lineup performance dependence

CHI lineups performed 6.3 points per 100 possessions better with Jevon Carter than without him. The best supported alternative was [DeMar DeRozan, Nikola Vucevic, Coby White, Patrick Williams, Ayo Dosunmu] over 244 possessions.

rotation 25%loses 7.3% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jevon Carter

DeMar DeRozan · Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Patrick Williams · Ayo Dosunmu

shrunk net 2.492 over 244 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,755 possessions · off floor 5,506 possessions

Dalen Terry
Lineup performance dependence

CHI lineups performed 5.7 points per 100 possessions better with Dalen Terry than without him. The best supported alternative was [DeMar DeRozan, Nikola Vucevic, Coby White, Patrick Williams, Ayo Dosunmu] over 244 possessions.

rotation 17%loses 6.8% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dalen Terry

DeMar DeRozan · Nikola Vucevic · Coby White · Patrick Williams · Ayo Dosunmu

shrunk net 2.492 over 244 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,217 possessions · off floor 6,056 possessions

Patrick Williams
Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

CHI had an observed replacement lineup for Patrick Williams, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [DeMar DeRozan, Nikola Vucevic, Torrey Craig, Coby White, Ayo Dosunmu] at -3.0 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 162 possessions.

rotation 29%loses 9.4% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Patrick Williams

DeMar DeRozan · Nikola Vucevic · Torrey Craig · Coby White · Ayo Dosunmu

shrunk net -2.98 over 162 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,059 possessions · off floor 5,214 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly DeMar DeRozan

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Nikola Vucevic

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Alex Caruso

Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 5 of the final 10 covered games — mainly DeMar DeRozan

Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Alex Caruso

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 4 of the final 10 covered games — mainly DeMar DeRozan

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 3 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Nikola Vucevic

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe team was in the tax but below the first apron on selected player charges.
Selected player charges
$165.6M
Share of cap
122%
Tax line
$336K over
First apron
$6.72M under
Second apron
$17.2M under

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is interior finishing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 88% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $136,021,000Luxury tax line: $165,294,000First apron: $172,346,000Second apron: $182,794,000Selected player charges: $165,630,436Source-reported payroll: $165,630,436 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
SupportedFull situation-room coverage available8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.