← Team Metrics
Latest

Cleveland Cavaliers

2024-25
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

How much flexibility did the Cleveland Cavaliers actually have in 2024-25?

CLE 2024-25 carried $171,830,703 of selected player charges (122.2% of the cap), placing it in tax to first apron on selected player charges. Its highest contracted function cost was passing connectivity at 22.8% of the cap; highest measured need was defensive event creation. Exact exception and transaction legality is withheld without team cap-hold and exception-use ledgers.

Current cap position

Current position on selected player charges — not every cap hold or dead-money charge.
SupportedTax to first apron on selected player charges
Selected player charges
$171.8M
Share of cap
122%
Tax line
$1.02M over
First apron
$6.30M under
Second apron
$17.1M under
Exact thresholds
Salary cap: $140,588,000Luxury tax line: $170,814,000First apron: $178,132,000Second apron: $188,931,000Selected player charges: $171,830,703Source-reported payroll: $172,471,107

Option exposure

Optional decisions ahead — reported amounts, not commitments.
Player options (0)
None
Team options (0)
None

Where the money maps

Which basketball functions the payroll is actually buying — shown beside need, never blended.

The largest contracted function cost is passing connectivity at $32.1M; the highest measured need is defensive event creation.

0 critical-need functions0 underfunded needs4 redundant-cost functionsmapping covers 86% of charges

Acquisition paths

Threshold candidates only — a candidate route is not exact transaction legality.
Bird-rights retention (threshold candidate)Trade salary matching (threshold candidate)Exception eligibility requires team ledgerMinimum signing
WithheldExact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Cash cost: Withheld — no cash-salary sample.

Selected player charges do not include every cap hold, dead-money charge or roster charge.

Threshold route candidates are not exact transaction legality.

Cash, cap and economic commitment remain separate; no universal flexibility or front-office score.