Golden State Warriors
2024-25Which players deserved investigation for the Golden State Warriors’ problems in 2024-25?
Jul 6, 2024 — Mike Dunleavy
The decision this board surrounds ultimately brought in Buddy Hield. Later outcomes never rewrite the board.GSW on 2024-07-06: the listed basketball needs were event creation, screening, rim protection. no source-clocked open candidate route was available. 0 open-market candidate(s) matched at least one listed need. Market access, basketball fit, price, salary route, and legality remain separate.
Klay Thompsoncap charge $15.9MWhy is he here?
Klay Thompson: the reported route for Klay Thompson was rejected, expired, agreed elsewhere, or otherwise not open. His strongest observed functions did not match the listed top needs. The salary screen was available, but contract-control records were ambiguous. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
era-correct salary lane screen only; exact apron team salary, post-trade salary, aggregation, exception inventory, guarantees, bonuses and full package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: -0.0 per 100 (O 0.7 / D -0.7) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
Historical decision board. A public-market player is not presented as a team target without a named team link. Minimum outgoing salary is not exact legality. Missing asking price is not a zero price. Later outcomes do not alter the decision-date board.
Jul 6, 2024 — Mike Dunleavy
The decision this board surrounds ultimately brought in Kyle Anderson. Later outcomes never rewrite the board.GSW on 2024-07-06: the listed basketball needs were event creation, screening, rim protection. no source-clocked open candidate route was available. 0 open-market candidate(s) matched at least one listed need. Market access, basketball fit, price, salary route, and legality remain separate.
Klay Thompsoncap charge $15.9MWhy is he here?
Klay Thompson: the reported route for Klay Thompson was rejected, expired, agreed elsewhere, or otherwise not open. His strongest observed functions did not match the listed top needs. The salary screen was available, but contract-control records were ambiguous. Exact transaction legality remains withheld without a complete package and exception ledger.
era-correct salary lane screen only; exact apron team salary, post-trade salary, aggregation, exception inventory, guarantees, bonuses and full package remain required for legality
prior-season impact context: -0.0 per 100 (O 0.7 / D -0.7) — Prior impact context is separate from team fit, price, and transaction value.
Historical decision board. A public-market player is not presented as a team target without a named team link. Minimum outgoing salary is not exact legality. Missing asking price is not a zero price. Later outcomes do not alter the decision-date board.