New Orleans Pelicans
2019-20Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
NOP has 9 actionable review nodes, but 3 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for E'Twaun Moore before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Brandon Ingram before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Josh Hart before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Lonzo Ball before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Frank Jackson before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Brandon Ingram. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Derrick Favors. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for E'Twaun Moore. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Frank Jackson. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Jrue Holiday before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for JJ Redick. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Josh Hart. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Lonzo Ball. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Jrue Holiday. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for Derrick Favors before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review a possible extension path for JJ Redick before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible guarantee structure for Derrick Favors. The exact decision date and downstream waiver, roster and cap effects are unavailable.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NOP. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
4 review nodes share this planning anchor for NOP. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
3 review nodes share this planning anchor for NOP. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.
One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
The guarantee review belongs to the same player and contract as the visible control horizon. Its exact date and waiver or cap effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.