← Team Metrics
Latest

New Orleans Pelicans

2017-18
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?

NOP has 3 actionable review nodes, but 1 nodes cannot be placed on a supported planning date.

PartialPartial contract identity coverage3 actionable of 7 nodes · 6 planning anchors · 1 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported

The decision map

Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Sep 27, 2015
DeMarcus CousinsExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for DeMarcus Cousins before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: DeMarcus Cousins would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for DeMarcus Cousins remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2018
2 decisions share this date
DeMarcus CousinsContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for DeMarcus Cousins. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Ian ClarkContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Ian Clark. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jul 21, 2018
E'Twaun MooreExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for E'Twaun Moore before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: E'Twaun Moore would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for E'Twaun Moore remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2020
E'Twaun MooreContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for E'Twaun Moore. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Jun 30, 2021
Anthony DavisContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Anthony Davis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
No supported date
Ian ClarkExtension reviewReview triggered exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Ian Clark before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Withheld — Extension candidate date and exact eligibility unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: UnresolvedIf “Extension is agreed”: Ian Clark would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Ian Clark remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.

Shared planning dates

Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.
Sep 27, 20151 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20182 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for NOP. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Jul 21, 20181 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20201 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20211 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for NOP. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Connected decisions

Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.
DeMarcus CousinsExtension review before the contract horizonSep 27, 2015 Jun 30, 2018

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

E'Twaun MooreExtension review before the contract horizonJul 21, 2018 Jun 30, 2020

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Ian ClarkExtension review before the contract horizonno date Jun 30, 2018

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.

A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.

Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.

Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.

Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.

Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.