Oklahoma City Thunder
2016-17Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?
OKC has 1 actionable review nodes with planning anchors. Exact contract deadlines and legal outcomes remain unresolved.
The decision map
Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.Review a possible extension path for Alex Abrines before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Alex Abrines. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Review the visible contract-control boundary for Domantas Sabonis. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.
What is and is not resolved
Shared planning dates
Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.
Connected decisions
Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.
Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.
A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.
Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.
Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.
Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.
Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.