← Team Metrics
Latest

Oklahoma City Thunder

2021-22
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

Which supported roster decisions should be reviewed first, what later choices depend on them, and what remains unknowable?

OKC has 2 actionable review nodes with planning anchors. Exact contract deadlines and legal outcomes remain unresolved.

PartialPartial contract identity coverage2 actionable of 4 nodes · 4 planning anchors · 0 unresolved · 0 exact dates supported

The decision map

Planning anchors are staff workflow dates — grouped, never promoted to exact deadlines.
Nov 23, 2022
Kenrich WilliamsExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Kenrich Williams before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Kenrich Williams would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Kenrich Williams remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Nov 24, 2022
Derrick FavorsExtension reviewGeneral anniversary candidate available exact extension eligibility unresolvedteam and player decide

Review a possible extension path for Derrick Favors before the visible contract horizon. Eligibility, terms, willingness and value are not certified.

Extension is agreedNo extension is recorded before the horizon
What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Extension review candidate visible exact eligibility and terms unresolvedCBA legality: Exact extension eligibility maximum terms and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Player willingness team willingness and price unresolvedSalary input: Extension salary terms unavailableDate basis: Anniversary review candidate — not a deadlineIf “Extension is agreed”: Derrick Favors would remain under new control, but eligibility, terms, willingness, price and future cap effects are unavailable.If “No extension is recorded before the horizon”: The existing reported control horizon for Derrick Favors remains the planning boundary; no outcome is inferred.
Jun 30, 2023
2 decisions share this date
Derrick FavorsContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Derrick Favors. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy
Kenrich WilliamsContract control horizonContract control horizon visible free agency status unresolvedTeam and player market decide

Review the visible contract-control boundary for Kenrich Williams. June 30 is a planning proxy, not certified free agency.

What is and is not resolved
Readiness: Planning boundary visible free agency and retention rights unresolvedCBA legality: Free agency retention rights and exceptions unresolvedMarket price: Future market price unresolvedSalary input: Contract horizon salary beyond boundary unresolvedDate basis: Season boundary proxy

Shared planning dates

Decisions that share a planning date — review pressure, not a claimed order.
Nov 23, 20221 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Nov 24, 20221 decision · 1 player

One review node uses this planning anchor for OKC. The anchor is not promoted to an exact contract deadline.

Jun 30, 20232 decisions · 2 players

2 review nodes share this planning anchor for OKC. They are grouped for staff workflow, not claimed as simultaneous contract deadlines.

Connected decisions

Same player, same contract — one decision affects the other.
Kenrich WilliamsExtension review before the contract horizonNov 23, 2022 → Jun 30, 2023

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Derrick FavorsExtension review before the contract horizonNov 24, 2022 → Jun 30, 2023

The extension review belongs to the same player and contract as the later visible control horizon. Exact eligibility and legal effect remain unresolved.

Planning anchors are not automatically exact contract deadlines.

A CBA outside date is an upper bound; an individual contract may require an earlier choice.

Current cap context is not a recalculated future branch result.

Unknown cap holds, rights, exceptions, roster effects, market prices and legal mechanics remain unresolved.

Branches are conditional planning frames, not probabilities or recommendations.

Decision sequence, reported salary, current cap position, roster effect, CBA legality, market price, basketball evidence and outcome evidence remain separate. No blended score or automatic action is produced.