← Team Metrics
Latest

Sacramento Kings

2019-20
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseLive database

How much flexibility did the Sacramento Kings actually have in 2019-20?

SAC 2019-20 carried $113,796,966 of selected player charges (104.3% of the cap), placing it in over cap below tax on selected player charges. Its highest contracted function cost was interior finishing at 16.3% of the cap; highest measured need was rim protection. Exact exception and transaction legality is withheld without team cap-hold and exception-use ledgers.

Current cap position

Current position on selected player charges — not every cap hold or dead-money charge.
SupportedOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Selected player charges
$113.8M
Share of cap
104%
Tax line
$18.8M under
First apron
$25.1M under
Second apron
No governed line that season
Exact thresholds
Salary cap: $109,140,000Luxury tax line: $132,627,000First apron: $138,928,000Second apron: —Selected player charges: $113,796,966Source-reported payroll: $113,796,966

Option exposure

Optional decisions ahead — reported amounts, not commitments.
Player options (0)
None
Team options (0)
None

Where the money maps

Which basketball functions the payroll is actually buying — shown beside need, never blended.

The largest contracted function cost is interior finishing at $17.8M; the highest measured need is rim protection.

2 critical-need functions0 underfunded needs0 redundant-cost functionsmapping covers 74% of charges

Acquisition paths

Threshold candidates only — a candidate route is not exact transaction legality.
Bird-rights retention (threshold candidate)Trade salary matching (threshold candidate)Non-taxpayer exception (threshold candidate only)Minimum signing
WithheldExact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Cash cost: Withheld — no cash-salary sample.

Selected player charges do not include every cap hold, dead-money charge or roster charge.

Threshold route candidates are not exact transaction legality.

Cash, cap and economic commitment remain separate; no universal flexibility or front-office score.