← Team Metrics
Latest

Toronto Raptors

2016-17
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Toronto Raptors in 2016-17, and what needed front-office attention?

TOR 2016-17: the clearest roster problems were Interior finishing, Passing connectivity, Rim protection. No supported strength was identified. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Kyle Lowry, DeMar DeRozan, Jonas Valanciunas, Patrick Patterson, Lucas Nogueira. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.

No supported team strengths for this season — team picture available; recent availability layer unavailable.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Interior finishing
8th percentile
Jonas Valanciunas carries 42.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

TOR 2016-17 Interior finishing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 7.7 league percentile. Jonas Valanciunas supplied 42.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Passing connectivity
19th percentile
Kyle Lowry carries 35.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2016-17 Passing connectivity: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 19.2 league percentile. Kyle Lowry supplied 35.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim protection
19th percentile
Jonas Valanciunas carries 32.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2016-17 Rim protection: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 19.2 league percentile. Jonas Valanciunas supplied 32.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league27th percentileKyle Lowry · 33.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileDeMarre Carroll · 20.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedCritical team problem8th percentileJonas Valanciunas · 42.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem19th percentileKyle Lowry · 35.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDelon WrightNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedStructural team problem23rd percentileJonas Valanciunas · 36.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league39th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 25.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem19th percentileJonas Valanciunas · 32.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDelon WrightNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk31st percentileKyle Lowry · 54.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDelon WrightNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Kyle Lowry
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

TOR was highly dependent on Kyle Lowry. Removing him cost about 33.7% of creation production, and lineups with him performed 7.6 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [P.J. Tucker, Serge Ibaka, DeMar DeRozan, Jonas Valanciunas, Cory Joseph] over 210 possessions.

rotation 57%loses 33.7% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kyle Lowry

P.J. Tucker · Serge Ibaka · DeMar DeRozan · Jonas Valanciunas · Cory Joseph

shrunk net 3.671 over 210 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,473 possessions · off floor 3,329 possessions

DeMar DeRozan
Single-skill dependence

TOR did not have strong functional backup for DeMar DeRozan in creation; removing him cost about 31.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Kyle Lowry.

rotation 67%loses 31.1% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without DeMar DeRozan

Kyle Lowry · Patrick Patterson · Cory Joseph · Terrence Ross · Lucas Nogueira

shrunk net 5.889 over 339 possessions

on floor 5,281 possessions · off floor 2,515 possessions

Jonas Valanciunas
Single-skill dependence

TOR did not have strong functional backup for Jonas Valanciunas in rebounding; removing him cost about 36.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was DeMar DeRozan.

rotation 52%loses 36.4% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jonas Valanciunas

Kyle Lowry · Patrick Patterson · Cory Joseph · Terrence Ross · Lucas Nogueira

shrunk net 5.889 over 339 possessions

on floor 4,043 possessions · off floor 3,759 possessions

Patrick Patterson
Lineup performance dependence

TOR lineups performed 7.3 points per 100 possessions better with Patrick Patterson than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kyle Lowry, DeMar DeRozan, DeMarre Carroll, Jonas Valanciunas, Lucas Nogueira] over 196 possessions.

rotation 40%loses 17.6% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Patrick Patterson

Kyle Lowry · DeMar DeRozan · DeMarre Carroll · Jonas Valanciunas · Lucas Nogueira

shrunk net 4.877 over 196 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,076 possessions · off floor 4,726 possessions

Lucas Nogueira
Lineup performance dependence

TOR lineups performed 5.9 points per 100 possessions better with Lucas Nogueira than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kyle Lowry, DeMar DeRozan, DeMarre Carroll, Patrick Patterson, Jonas Valanciunas] over 253 possessions.

rotation 25%loses 14.9% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Lucas Nogueira

Kyle Lowry · DeMar DeRozan · DeMarre Carroll · Patrick Patterson · Jonas Valanciunas

shrunk net 7.609 over 253 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,937 possessions · off floor 5,865 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$108.6M
Share of cap
115%
Tax line
$4.69M under
First apron
$8.69M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is interior finishing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 84% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $94,143,000Luxury tax line: $113,287,000First apron: $117,287,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $108,599,970Source-reported payroll: $108,599,970 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.