← Team Metrics
Latest

Toronto Raptors

2018-19
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Toronto Raptors in 2018-19, and what needed front-office attention?

TOR 2018-19: the clearest roster problems were Interior finishing, Rim protection. The strongest covered areas were Rim pressure, Shooting and spacing, Creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Kyle Lowry, Danny Green, Serge Ibaka, Kawhi Leonard. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionAt or above first apron no second apron threshold
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim pressure
81st percentile
Kawhi Leonard carries 37.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2018-19 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 81.0 league percentile. Kawhi Leonard supplied 37.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Shooting and spacing
81st percentile
Danny Green carries 29.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2018-19 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 81.0 league percentile. Danny Green supplied 29.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Creation
76th percentile
Kyle Lowry carries 32.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2018-19 Creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 76.2 league percentile. Kyle Lowry supplied 32.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Interior finishing
24th percentile
Serge Ibaka carries 26.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2018-19 Interior finishing: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 23.8 league percentile. Serge Ibaka supplied 26.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim protection
24th percentile
Serge Ibaka carries 35.9%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

TOR 2018-19 Rim protection: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 23.8 league percentile. Serge Ibaka supplied 35.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength76th percentileKyle Lowry · 32.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league52nd percentileKawhi Leonard · 24.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedStructural team problem24th percentileSerge Ibaka · 26.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league71st percentileKyle Lowry · 36.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNorman PowellNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league62nd percentileKawhi Leonard · 32.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength81st percentileKawhi Leonard · 37.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem24th percentileSerge Ibaka · 35.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNorman PowellNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength81st percentileDanny Green · 29.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldNorman PowellNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Kyle Lowry
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

TOR was highly dependent on Kyle Lowry. Removing him cost about 36.1% of passing production, and lineups with him performed 11.1 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Serge Ibaka, Danny Green, Kawhi Leonard, Pascal Siakam, Fred VanVleet] over 378 possessions.

rotation 61%loses 36.1% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kyle Lowry

Serge Ibaka · Danny Green · Kawhi Leonard · Pascal Siakam · Fred VanVleet

shrunk net 5.928 over 378 possessions

on floor 5,699 possessions · off floor 3,732 possessions

Danny Green
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

TOR was highly dependent on Danny Green. Removing him cost about 29.8% of shooting production, and lineups with him performed 13.5 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Kyle Lowry, Serge Ibaka, Kawhi Leonard, Pascal Siakam, Fred VanVleet] over 166 possessions.

rotation 56%loses 29.8% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Danny Green

Kyle Lowry · Serge Ibaka · Kawhi Leonard · Pascal Siakam · Fred VanVleet

shrunk net 2.843 over 166 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,366 possessions · off floor 4,054 possessions

Serge Ibaka
Single-skill dependence

TOR did not have strong functional backup for Serge Ibaka in rim protection; removing him cost about 35.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Pascal Siakam.

rotation 49%loses 35.9% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Serge Ibaka

Kyle Lowry · Marc Gasol · Danny Green · Kawhi Leonard · Pascal Siakam

shrunk net 7.773 over 1,029 possessions

on floor 4,568 possessions · off floor 4,861 possessions

Kawhi Leonard
Lineup performance dependence

TOR lineups performed 6.7 points per 100 possessions better with Kawhi Leonard than without him. The best supported alternative was [Kyle Lowry, Serge Ibaka, Danny Green, Pascal Siakam, Fred VanVleet] over 368 possessions.

rotation 58%loses 24.7% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kawhi Leonard

Kyle Lowry · Serge Ibaka · Danny Green · Pascal Siakam · Fred VanVleet

shrunk net 8.209 over 368 possessions

on floor 5,365 possessions · off floor 4,026 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedThe financial threshold state is era-specific and must be read with the underlying rules.
Selected player charges
$137.8M
Share of cap
135%
Tax line
$14.1M over
First apron
$7.98M over
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to creation; the highest-need area is interior finishing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 81% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $101,869,000Luxury tax line: $123,733,000First apron: $129,817,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $137,793,831Source-reported payroll: $137,793,831 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.