← Team Metrics
Latest

Indiana Pacers

2017-18
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Indiana Pacers in 2017-18, and what needed front-office attention?

IND 2017-18: the clearest roster problems were Creation, Rim protection, Rebounding. The strongest covered areas were Defensive event creation, Rim pressure, Shooting and spacing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Victor Oladipo, Bojan Bogdanovic, Domantas Sabonis, Darren Collison, Myles Turner. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionUnder cap on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Defensive event creation
89th percentile
Victor Oladipo carries 35.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2017-18 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 88.9 league percentile. Victor Oladipo supplied 35.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Rim pressure
82nd percentile
Victor Oladipo carries 32.5%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2017-18 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 81.5 league percentile. Victor Oladipo supplied 32.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Shooting and spacing
78th percentile
Bojan Bogdanovic carries 29.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2017-18 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 77.8 league percentile. Bojan Bogdanovic supplied 29.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Creation
19th percentile
Victor Oladipo carries 26.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

IND 2017-18 Creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 18.5 league percentile. Victor Oladipo supplied 26.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Rim protection
19th percentile
Myles Turner carries 36.3%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

IND 2017-18 Rim protection: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 18.5 league percentile. Myles Turner supplied 36.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Rebounding
22nd percentile
Thaddeus Young carries 28.9%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

IND 2017-18 Rebounding: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 22.2 league percentile. Thaddeus Young supplied 28.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedStructural team problem19th percentileVictor Oladipo · 26.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength89th percentileVictor Oladipo · 35.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileThaddeus Young · 26.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league41st percentileVictor Oladipo · 24.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedStructural team problem22nd percentileThaddeus Young · 28.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength82nd percentileVictor Oladipo · 32.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedStructural team problem19th percentileMyles Turner · 36.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength78th percentileBojan Bogdanovic · 29.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Victor Oladipo
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

IND was highly dependent on Victor Oladipo. Removing him cost about 35.0% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 11.0 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Thaddeus Young, Darren Collison, Lance Stephenson, Bojan Bogdanovic, Myles Turner] over 153 possessions.

rotation 66%loses 35.0% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Victor Oladipo

Thaddeus Young · Darren Collison · Lance Stephenson · Bojan Bogdanovic · Myles Turner

shrunk net -0.029 over 153 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,030 possessions · off floor 2,594 possessions

Bojan Bogdanovic
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Bojan Bogdanovic in shooting; removing him cost about 29.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Darren Collison.

rotation 63%loses 29.4% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Bojan Bogdanovic

Thaddeus Young · Lance Stephenson · Cory Joseph · Victor Oladipo · Domantas Sabonis

shrunk net 3.449 over 221 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,891 possessions · off floor 2,738 possessions

Domantas Sabonis
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Domantas Sabonis in rim protection; removing him cost about 27.5% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Myles Turner.

rotation 46%loses 27.5% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Domantas Sabonis

Thaddeus Young · Cory Joseph · Bojan Bogdanovic · Victor Oladipo · Myles Turner

shrunk net 5.583 over 610 possessions

on floor 3,430 possessions · off floor 4,195 possessions

Darren Collison
Lineup performance dependence

IND lineups performed 3.3 points per 100 possessions better with Darren Collison than without him. The best supported alternative was [Thaddeus Young, Cory Joseph, Bojan Bogdanovic, Victor Oladipo, Myles Turner] over 610 possessions.

rotation 52%loses 25.4% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Darren Collison

Thaddeus Young · Cory Joseph · Bojan Bogdanovic · Victor Oladipo · Myles Turner

shrunk net 5.583 over 610 possessions

on floor 4,047 possessions · off floor 3,575 possessions

Myles Turner
Lineup performance dependence

IND lineups performed 3.2 points per 100 possessions better with Myles Turner than without him. The best supported alternative was [Thaddeus Young, Cory Joseph, Bojan Bogdanovic, Victor Oladipo, Domantas Sabonis] over 154 possessions.

rotation 47%loses 36.3% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Myles Turner

Thaddeus Young · Cory Joseph · Bojan Bogdanovic · Victor Oladipo · Domantas Sabonis

shrunk net 4.016 over 154 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,671 possessions · off floor 3,958 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
SupportedSelected player charges appeared below the cap, but holds and incomplete roster charges prevent a clean cap-room claim.
Selected player charges
$93.8M
Share of cap
95%
Tax line
$25.5M under
First apron
$31.5M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to defensive event creation; the highest-need area is creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 93% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $99,093,000Luxury tax line: $119,266,000First apron: $125,266,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $93,800,354Source-reported payroll: $95,271,736 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.