← Team Metrics
Latest

Indiana Pacers

2019-20
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Indiana Pacers in 2019-20, and what needed front-office attention?

IND 2019-20: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Defensive event creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were T.J. Warren, Myles Turner, Justin Holiday, Malcolm Brogdon, Domantas Sabonis. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 29, 2020 · 9 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Defensive event creation
77th percentile
Justin Holiday carries 25.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2019-20 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 76.9 league percentile. Justin Holiday supplied 25.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — team picture available; recent availability layer unavailable.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league31st percentileMalcolm Brogdon · 29.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength77th percentileJustin Holiday · 25.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league69th percentileT.J. Warren · 26.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileMalcolm Brogdon · 26.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk27th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 43.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league73rd percentileT.J. Warren · 33.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileMyles Turner · 36.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league65th percentileT.J. Warren · 26.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
T.J. Warren
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for T.J. Warren in interior finish; removing him cost about 26.7% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Myles Turner.

rotation 63%loses 26.7% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without T.J. Warren

Justin Holiday · Doug McDermott · T.J. McConnell · Domantas Sabonis · Aaron Holiday

shrunk net 4.632 over 446 possessions

on floor 4,122 possessions · off floor 2,515 possessions

Myles Turner
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Myles Turner in rim protection; removing him cost about 36.3% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Domantas Sabonis.

rotation 53%loses 36.3% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Myles Turner

Justin Holiday · Doug McDermott · T.J. McConnell · Domantas Sabonis · Aaron Holiday

shrunk net 4.632 over 446 possessions

on floor 3,453 possessions · off floor 3,179 possessions

Justin Holiday
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Justin Holiday in event creation; removing him cost about 25.8% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was T.J. Warren.

rotation 53%loses 25.8% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Justin Holiday

Victor Oladipo · T.J. Warren · Myles Turner · Domantas Sabonis · Malcolm Brogdon

shrunk net 3.723 over 159 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,492 possessions · off floor 3,173 possessions

Malcolm Brogdon
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Malcolm Brogdon in creation; removing him cost about 29.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was T.J. McConnell.

rotation 49%loses 29.6% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Malcolm Brogdon

Justin Holiday · Doug McDermott · T.J. McConnell · Domantas Sabonis · Aaron Holiday

shrunk net 4.632 over 446 possessions

on floor 3,162 possessions · off floor 3,504 possessions

Domantas Sabonis
Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

IND had an observed replacement lineup for Domantas Sabonis, but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Victor Oladipo, T.J. Warren, Myles Turner, Malcolm Brogdon, Aaron Holiday] at -2.9 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 182 possessions.

rotation 59%loses 19.8% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Domantas Sabonis

Victor Oladipo · T.J. Warren · Myles Turner · Malcolm Brogdon · Aaron Holiday

shrunk net -2.944 over 182 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,941 possessions · off floor 2,682 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$112.9M
Share of cap
103%
Tax line
$19.8M under
First apron
$26.1M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is rebounding. Salary-to-function mapping covers 100% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $109,140,000Luxury tax line: $132,627,000First apron: $138,928,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $112,872,260Source-reported payroll: $112,872,260 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.