← Team Metrics
Latest

Indiana Pacers

2020-21
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Indiana Pacers in 2020-21, and what needed front-office attention?

IND 2020-21: the clearest roster problems were Rebounding, Creation, Passing connectivity. The strongest covered areas were Rim protection. The main rotation-player dependency cases were T.J. McConnell, Doug McDermott, Myles Turner, Oshae Brissett. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2021 · 8 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rim protection
90th percentile
Myles Turner carries 26.6%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2020-21 Rim protection: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 90.0 league percentile. Myles Turner supplied 26.6% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rebounding
10th percentile
Domantas Sabonis carries 47.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

IND 2020-21 Rebounding: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 10.0 league percentile. Domantas Sabonis supplied 47.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

Creation
20th percentile
T.J. McConnell carries 30.3%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2020-21 Creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 20.0 league percentile. T.J. McConnell supplied 30.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Passing connectivity
20th percentile
T.J. McConnell carries 32.5%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2020-21 Passing connectivity: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 20.0 league percentile. T.J. McConnell supplied 32.5% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedStructural team problem20th percentileT.J. McConnell · 30.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league70th percentileT.J. McConnell · 27.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league40th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 27.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem20th percentileT.J. McConnell · 32.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMalcolm BrogdonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedCritical team problem10th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 47.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league70th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 29.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedTeam strength90th percentileMyles Turner · 26.6%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league50th percentileJustin Holiday · 24.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMalcolm BrogdonNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
T.J. McConnell
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

IND was highly dependent on T.J. McConnell. Removing him cost about 32.4% of passing production, and lineups with him performed 5.2 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Justin Holiday, Domantas Sabonis, Caris LeVert, Malcolm Brogdon, Edmond Sumner] over 190 possessions.

rotation 52%loses 32.4% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without T.J. McConnell

Justin Holiday · Domantas Sabonis · Caris LeVert · Malcolm Brogdon · Edmond Sumner

shrunk net 2.403 over 190 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,459 possessions · off floor 3,298 possessions

Doug McDermott
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Doug McDermott in interior finish; removing him cost about 25.6% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Domantas Sabonis.

rotation 46%loses 25.6% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Doug McDermott

Justin Holiday · Domantas Sabonis · Caris LeVert · Malcolm Brogdon · Edmond Sumner

shrunk net 2.403 over 190 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,132 possessions · off floor 3,625 possessions

Myles Turner
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Myles Turner in rim protection; removing him cost about 26.5% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Domantas Sabonis.

rotation 41%loses 26.5% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Myles Turner

Justin Holiday · Domantas Sabonis · Caris LeVert · Malcolm Brogdon · Edmond Sumner

shrunk net 2.403 over 190 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,698 possessions · off floor 4,059 possessions

Oshae Brissett
Lineup performance dependence

IND lineups performed 4.0 points per 100 possessions better with Oshae Brissett than without him. The best supported alternative was [Justin Holiday, Domantas Sabonis, Caris LeVert, Malcolm Brogdon, Edmond Sumner] over 190 possessions.

rotation 16%loses 5.5% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Oshae Brissett

Justin Holiday · Domantas Sabonis · Caris LeVert · Malcolm Brogdon · Edmond Sumner

shrunk net 2.403 over 190 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,175 possessions · off floor 5,582 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$130.2M
Share of cap
119%
Tax line
$2.39M under
First apron
$8.69M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is rebounding. Salary-to-function mapping covers 86% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $109,140,000Luxury tax line: $132,627,000First apron: $138,928,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $130,237,102Source-reported payroll: $130,237,102 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.