← Team Metrics
Latest

Indiana Pacers

2018-19
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Indiana Pacers in 2018-19, and what needed front-office attention?

IND 2018-19: the clearest roster problems were Rim protection, Rebounding. The strongest covered areas were Interior finishing, Shooting and spacing, Defensive event creation. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Darren Collison, Myles Turner, Cory Joseph, Victor Oladipo. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Interior finishing
95th percentile
Bojan Bogdanovic carries 23.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2018-19 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.2 league percentile. Bojan Bogdanovic supplied 23.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Shooting and spacing
95th percentile
Bojan Bogdanovic carries 29.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2018-19 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 95.2 league percentile. Bojan Bogdanovic supplied 29.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Defensive event creation
91st percentile
Thaddeus Young carries 24.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

IND 2018-19 Defensive event creation: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 90.5 league percentile. Thaddeus Young supplied 24.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Rim protection
5th percentile
Myles Turner carries 49.0%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

IND 2018-19 Rim protection: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.8 league percentile. Myles Turner supplied 49.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Rebounding
14th percentile
Domantas Sabonis carries 34.2%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Underfunded structural need
Full reading

IND 2018-19 Rebounding: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 14.3 league percentile. Domantas Sabonis supplied 34.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this structural need was comparatively low.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedTeam strength81st percentileDarren Collison · 26.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Defensive event creationSupportedTeam strength91st percentileThaddeus Young · 24.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength95th percentileBojan Bogdanovic · 23.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedTeam strength86th percentileDarren Collison · 27.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedStructural team problem14th percentileDomantas Sabonis · 34.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonUnderfunded structural need
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league67th percentileBojan Bogdanovic · 36.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim protectionSupportedCritical team problem5th percentileMyles Turner · 49.0%No recent availability layer for this seasonComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength95th percentileBojan Bogdanovic · 29.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldMyles TurnerNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Darren Collison
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Darren Collison in passing; removing him cost about 27.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Cory Joseph.

rotation 55%loses 27.4% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Darren Collison

Thaddeus Young · Tyreke Evans · Cory Joseph · Doug McDermott · Domantas Sabonis

shrunk net 8.483 over 312 possessions

on floor 4,167 possessions · off floor 3,398 possessions

Myles Turner
Single-skill dependence

IND did not have strong functional backup for Myles Turner in rim protection; removing him cost about 49.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Domantas Sabonis.

rotation 54%loses 49.0% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Myles Turner

Thaddeus Young · Tyreke Evans · Cory Joseph · Doug McDermott · Domantas Sabonis

shrunk net 8.483 over 312 possessions

on floor 4,108 possessions · off floor 3,448 possessions

Cory Joseph
Lineup performance dependence

IND lineups performed 4.8 points per 100 possessions better with Cory Joseph than without him. The best supported alternative was [Thaddeus Young, Tyreke Evans, Darren Collison, Bojan Bogdanovic, Myles Turner] over 506 possessions.

rotation 52%loses 21.3% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Cory Joseph

Thaddeus Young · Tyreke Evans · Darren Collison · Bojan Bogdanovic · Myles Turner

shrunk net 3.905 over 506 possessions

on floor 3,826 possessions · off floor 3,723 possessions

Victor Oladipo
Lineup performance dependence

IND lineups performed 3.9 points per 100 possessions better with Victor Oladipo than without him. The best supported alternative was [Thaddeus Young, Tyreke Evans, Cory Joseph, Doug McDermott, Domantas Sabonis] over 312 possessions.

rotation 28%loses 9.4% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Victor Oladipo

Thaddeus Young · Tyreke Evans · Cory Joseph · Doug McDermott · Domantas Sabonis

shrunk net 8.483 over 312 possessions

on floor 2,082 possessions · off floor 5,483 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$110.7M
Share of cap
109%
Tax line
$13.1M under
First apron
$19.1M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to defensive event creation; the highest-need area is rim protection. Salary-to-function mapping covers 91% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $101,869,000Luxury tax line: $123,733,000First apron: $129,817,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $110,677,434Source-reported payroll: $110,724,804 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.