← Team Metrics
Latest

San Antonio Spurs

2018-19
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the San Antonio Spurs in 2018-19, and what needed front-office attention?

SAS 2018-19: the clearest roster problems were Defensive event creation, Interior finishing, Rim pressure. The strongest covered areas were Shooting and spacing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Derrick White, DeMar DeRozan, LaMarcus Aldridge, Bryn Forbes, Patty Mills. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2019 · 6 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Shooting and spacing
91st percentile
Bryn Forbes carries 26.4%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAS 2018-19 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 90.5 league percentile. Bryn Forbes supplied 26.4% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Defensive event creation
0th percentile
Derrick White carries 34.7%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Comparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Full reading

SAS 2018-19 Defensive event creation: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Derrick White supplied 34.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The cap allocation to this critical need was comparatively low.

Interior finishing
14th percentile
LaMarcus Aldridge carries 43.8%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Balanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Full reading

SAS 2018-19 Interior finishing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 14.3 league percentile. LaMarcus Aldridge supplied 43.8% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Financial commitment is shown separately and does not determine basketball quality.

Rim pressure
14th percentile
DeMar DeRozan carries 37.3%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAS 2018-19 Rim pressure: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 14.3 league percentile. DeMar DeRozan supplied 37.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk48th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 40.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonCost concentrated in one provider
Defensive event creationSupportedCritical team problem0th percentileDerrick White · 34.7%No recent availability layer for this seasonComparatively little salary committed to a critical need
Interior finishingSupportedCritical team problem14th percentileLaMarcus Aldridge · 43.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league57th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 37.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJakob PoeltlNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk57th percentileLaMarcus Aldridge · 41.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim pressureSupportedCritical team problem14th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 37.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk38th percentileLaMarcus Aldridge · 41.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJakob PoeltlNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength91st percentileBryn Forbes · 26.4%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJakob PoeltlNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Derrick White
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

SAS was highly dependent on Derrick White. Removing him cost about 34.7% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 5.4 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [LaMarcus Aldridge, Rudy Gay, Marco Belinelli, Patty Mills, Davis Bertans] over 156 possessions.

rotation 45%loses 34.7% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Derrick White

LaMarcus Aldridge · Rudy Gay · Marco Belinelli · Patty Mills · Davis Bertans

shrunk net 5.925 over 156 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,471 possessions · off floor 4,361 possessions

DeMar DeRozan
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for DeMar DeRozan in creation; removing him cost about 40.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Derrick White.

rotation 68%loses 40.4% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without DeMar DeRozan

LaMarcus Aldridge · Rudy Gay · Marco Belinelli · Patty Mills · Davis Bertans

shrunk net 5.925 over 156 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,340 possessions · off floor 2,509 possessions

LaMarcus Aldridge
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for LaMarcus Aldridge in interior finish; removing him cost about 43.8% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Rudy Gay.

rotation 68%loses 43.8% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without LaMarcus Aldridge

Rudy Gay · Marco Belinelli · Patty Mills · Davis Bertans · Jakob Poeltl

shrunk net 3.821 over 239 possessions — small sample

on floor 5,334 possessions · off floor 2,524 possessions

Bryn Forbes
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for Bryn Forbes in shooting; removing him cost about 26.4% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Patty Mills.

rotation 58%loses 26.4% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Bryn Forbes

LaMarcus Aldridge · Rudy Gay · Marco Belinelli · Patty Mills · Davis Bertans

shrunk net 5.925 over 156 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,612 possessions · off floor 3,246 possessions

Patty Mills
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 3.2 points per 100 possessions better with Patty Mills than without him. The best supported alternative was [LaMarcus Aldridge, DeMar DeRozan, Davis Bertans, Bryn Forbes, Derrick White] over 265 possessions.

rotation 48%loses 18.0% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Patty Mills

LaMarcus Aldridge · DeMar DeRozan · Davis Bertans · Bryn Forbes · Derrick White

shrunk net 4.967 over 265 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,775 possessions · off floor 4,055 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$121.6M
Share of cap
119%
Tax line
$2.14M under
First apron
$8.23M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to passing connectivity; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 83% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $101,869,000Luxury tax line: $123,733,000First apron: $129,817,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $121,588,790Source-reported payroll: $121,588,790 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.