← Team Metrics
Latest

San Antonio Spurs

2024-25
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the San Antonio Spurs in 2024-25, and what needed front-office attention?

SAS 2024-25: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding, Interior finishing, Rim pressure. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Victor Wembanyama, Blake Wesley. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial9 supported · 2 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2025 · 6 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
88th percentile
Victor Wembanyama carries 20.9%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAS 2024-25 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 87.5 league percentile. Victor Wembanyama supplied 20.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 8 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Interior finishing
83rd percentile
Harrison Barnes carries 19.2%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAS 2024-25 Interior finishing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 83.3 league percentile. Harrison Barnes supplied 19.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 8 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Rim pressure
75th percentile
Stephon Castle carries 21.9%
Availability: Absences repeatedly created a problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAS 2024-25 Rim pressure: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 75.0 league percentile. Stephon Castle supplied 21.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences created a shortage in 8 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — team picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league54th percentileChris Paul · 27.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league54th percentileChris Paul · 24.8%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedTeam strength83rd percentileHarrison Barnes · 19.2%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league58th percentileChris Paul · 29.6%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldChris PaulRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength88th percentileVictor Wembanyama · 20.9%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedTeam strength75th percentileStephon Castle · 21.9%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league33rd percentileVictor Wembanyama · 36.6%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningSupportedMiddle of the league56th percentileVictor Wembanyama · 28.5%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedMiddle of the league46th percentileHarrison Barnes · 32.8%Absences repeatedly created a problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKeldon JohnsonRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Victor Wembanyama
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

SAS was highly dependent on Victor Wembanyama. Removing him cost about 36.6% of rim protection production, and lineups with him performed 8.4 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Chris Paul, Bismack Biyombo, Harrison Barnes, Devin Vassell, Stephon Castle] over 231 possessions.

rotation 38%loses 36.6% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Victor Wembanyama

Chris Paul · Bismack Biyombo · Harrison Barnes · Devin Vassell · Stephon Castle

shrunk net -2.357 over 231 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,815 possessions · off floor 4,364 possessions

Blake Wesley
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 3.7 points per 100 possessions better with Blake Wesley than without him. The best supported alternative was [Chris Paul, Harrison Barnes, Devin Vassell, Jeremy Sochan, Victor Wembanyama] over 263 possessions.

rotation 17%loses 7.7% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Blake Wesley

Chris Paul · Harrison Barnes · Devin Vassell · Jeremy Sochan · Victor Wembanyama

shrunk net 4.728 over 263 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,237 possessions · off floor 5,961 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Victor Wembanyama

Defensive event creation

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Devin Vassell

Interior finishing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Keldon Johnson

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Victor Wembanyama

Rebounding

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Victor Wembanyama

Rim pressure

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Keldon Johnson

Rim protection

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Victor Wembanyama

Screening

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Victor Wembanyama

Shooting and spacing

Absences repeatedly created a problem

created in 8 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Devin Vassell

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$162.2M
Share of cap
115%
Tax line
$8.65M under
First apron
$16.0M under
Second apron
$26.8M under

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is rim protection. Salary-to-function mapping covers 73% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $140,588,000Luxury tax line: $170,814,000First apron: $178,132,000Second apron: $188,931,000Selected player charges: $162,163,506Source-reported payroll: $165,395,330 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete9 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.