← Team Metrics
Latest

San Antonio Spurs

2019-20
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the San Antonio Spurs in 2019-20, and what needed front-office attention?

SAS 2019-20: no supported structural problem was identified. The strongest covered areas were Shooting and spacing. The main rotation-player dependency cases were DeMar DeRozan, LaMarcus Aldridge, Dejounte Murray, Patty Mills, Jakob Poeltl. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2020 · 8 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Shooting and spacing
77th percentile
Bryn Forbes carries 19.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Heavy or redundant salary already committed here
Full reading

SAS 2019-20 Shooting and spacing: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 76.9 league percentile. Bryn Forbes supplied 19.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. The team already committed substantial or redundant cap resources here.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.

No supported roster problems are on record for this season — team picture available; recent availability layer unavailable.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle-tier area with one-player risk35th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 42.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonCost concentrated in one provider
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league39th percentileDejounte Murray · 32.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league27th percentileLaMarcus Aldridge · 28.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league54th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 35.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldTrey LylesNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
ReboundingSupportedMiddle of the league65th percentileRudy Gay · 24.5%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league42nd percentileDeMar DeRozan · 36.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league65th percentileLaMarcus Aldridge · 24.9%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldTrey LylesNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment
Shooting and spacingSupportedTeam strength77th percentileBryn Forbes · 19.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonHeavy or redundant salary already committed here
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldTrey LylesNo recent availability layer for this seasonBalanced or context-dependent salary commitment

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
DeMar DeRozan
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for DeMar DeRozan in creation; removing him cost about 42.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Dejounte Murray.

rotation 67%loses 42.9% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without DeMar DeRozan

Rudy Gay · Patty Mills · Jakob Poeltl · Derrick White · Lonnie Walker IV

shrunk net 2.44 over 253 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,159 possessions · off floor 2,112 possessions

LaMarcus Aldridge
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for LaMarcus Aldridge in interior finish; removing him cost about 28.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Rudy Gay.

rotation 51%loses 28.1% of interior finishing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without LaMarcus Aldridge

Rudy Gay · Patty Mills · Jakob Poeltl · Derrick White · Lonnie Walker IV

shrunk net 2.44 over 253 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,146 possessions · off floor 3,110 possessions

Dejounte Murray
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for Dejounte Murray in event creation; removing him cost about 32.1% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jakob Poeltl.

rotation 49%loses 32.1% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Dejounte Murray

Rudy Gay · Patty Mills · Jakob Poeltl · Derrick White · Lonnie Walker IV

shrunk net 2.44 over 253 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,068 possessions · off floor 3,203 possessions

Patty Mills
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 7.6 points per 100 possessions better with Patty Mills than without him. The best supported alternative was [LaMarcus Aldridge, DeMar DeRozan, Trey Lyles, Bryn Forbes, Derrick White] over 189 possessions.

rotation 43%loses 14.5% of shooting and spacing
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Patty Mills

LaMarcus Aldridge · DeMar DeRozan · Trey Lyles · Bryn Forbes · Derrick White

shrunk net 0.008 over 189 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,674 possessions · off floor 3,597 possessions

Jakob Poeltl
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 10.2 points per 100 possessions better with Jakob Poeltl than without him. The best supported alternative was [LaMarcus Aldridge, DeMar DeRozan, Trey Lyles, Bryn Forbes, Derrick White] over 189 possessions.

rotation 34%loses 22.1% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jakob Poeltl

LaMarcus Aldridge · DeMar DeRozan · Trey Lyles · Bryn Forbes · Derrick White

shrunk net 0.008 over 189 possessions — small sample

on floor 2,133 possessions · off floor 4,124 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$119.2M
Share of cap
109%
Tax line
$13.4M under
First apron
$19.7M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to interior finishing; the highest-need area is defensive event creation. Salary-to-function mapping covers 94% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $109,140,000Luxury tax line: $132,627,000First apron: $138,928,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $119,217,331Source-reported payroll: $119,217,331 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability layer unavailable8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.