← Team Metrics
Latest

San Antonio Spurs

2020-21
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the San Antonio Spurs in 2020-21, and what needed front-office attention?

SAS 2020-21: the clearest roster problems were Shooting and spacing, Interior finishing. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Jakob Poeltl, DeMar DeRozan, Patty Mills, Rudy Gay, Derrick White. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateJun 30, 2021 · 6 events →

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
100th percentile
Keldon Johnson carries 17.3%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAS 2020-21 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Keldon Johnson supplied 17.3% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Shooting and spacing
0th percentile
Patty Mills carries 39.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAS 2020-21 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 0.0 league percentile. Patty Mills supplied 39.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Interior finishing
20th percentile
Jakob Poeltl carries 21.1%
Availability: No governed recent availability evidence for this seasonMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

SAS 2020-21 Interior finishing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 20.0 league percentile. Jakob Poeltl supplied 21.1% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedMiddle of the league70th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 35.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league30th percentileDejounte Murray · 34.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedCritical team problem20th percentileJakob Poeltl · 21.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedMiddle of the league70th percentileDeMar DeRozan · 32.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDejounte MurrayNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength100th percentileKeldon Johnson · 17.3%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league40th percentileKeldon Johnson · 27.2%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league60th percentileJakob Poeltl · 38.8%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldJakob PoeltlNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem0th percentilePatty Mills · 39.1%No recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldDejounte MurrayNo recent availability layer for this seasonSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Jakob Poeltl
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

SAS was highly dependent on Jakob Poeltl. Removing him cost about 38.8% of rim protection production, and lineups with him performed 9.1 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [LaMarcus Aldridge, DeMar DeRozan, Dejounte Murray, Lonnie Walker IV, Keldon Johnson] over 413 possessions.

rotation 53%loses 38.8% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jakob Poeltl

LaMarcus Aldridge · DeMar DeRozan · Dejounte Murray · Lonnie Walker IV · Keldon Johnson

shrunk net -6.522 over 413 possessions

on floor 3,393 possessions · off floor 3,016 possessions

DeMar DeRozan
Single-skill dependence

SAS did not have strong functional backup for DeMar DeRozan in creation; removing him cost about 35.2% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Dejounte Murray.

rotation 59%loses 35.1% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without DeMar DeRozan

Rudy Gay · Patty Mills · Dejounte Murray · Jakob Poeltl · Devin Vassell

shrunk net 8.966 over 225 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,812 possessions · off floor 2,591 possessions

Patty Mills
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 6.3 points per 100 possessions better with Patty Mills than without him. The best supported alternative was [DeMar DeRozan, Dejounte Murray, Jakob Poeltl, Derrick White, Keldon Johnson] over 646 possessions.

rotation 48%loses 13.6% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Patty Mills

DeMar DeRozan · Dejounte Murray · Jakob Poeltl · Derrick White · Keldon Johnson

shrunk net 4.378 over 646 possessions

on floor 3,067 possessions · off floor 3,342 possessions

Rudy Gay
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 6.8 points per 100 possessions better with Rudy Gay than without him. The best supported alternative was [DeMar DeRozan, Dejounte Murray, Jakob Poeltl, Derrick White, Keldon Johnson] over 646 possessions.

rotation 39%loses 16.4% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Rudy Gay

DeMar DeRozan · Dejounte Murray · Jakob Poeltl · Derrick White · Keldon Johnson

shrunk net 4.378 over 646 possessions

on floor 2,471 possessions · off floor 3,938 possessions

Derrick White
Lineup performance dependence

SAS lineups performed 7.5 points per 100 possessions better with Derrick White than without him. The best supported alternative was [Rudy Gay, Patty Mills, Dejounte Murray, Jakob Poeltl, Devin Vassell] over 225 possessions.

rotation 30%loses 13.5% of passing connectivity
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Derrick White

Rudy Gay · Patty Mills · Dejounte Murray · Jakob Poeltl · Devin Vassell

shrunk net 8.966 over 225 possessions — small sample

on floor 1,892 possessions · off floor 4,505 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.

No governed recent game-level availability layer exists for this season.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$129.5M
Share of cap
119%
Tax line
$3.09M under
First apron
$9.39M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Most salary is mapped to passing connectivity; the highest-need area is shooting and spacing. Salary-to-function mapping covers 79% of charges.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $109,140,000Luxury tax line: $132,627,000First apron: $138,928,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $129,537,825Source-reported payroll: $129,537,825 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; recent availability and function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.