Gingeball

League Board

Which teams have the most open conditional paths — and how much still needs a dated test?

As ofLatest

Decision volume Planning windows Sequencing workload Keep/exit optionality Competitive window

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26

sorted by open paths · click a column to re-sort · click a team for its workspace · open a row for why it is here

Team	Branches	Open paths	Needs planning	Needs evidence	Needs dated test	Path abstentions	Basketball gaps
LAL LAL has 30 conditional decision branches and 23 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	30	23	7	7	30	60	0
NYK NYK has 26 conditional decision branches and 20 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	26	20	6	32	26	26	0
BOS BOS has 24 conditional decision branches and 19 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	24	19	5	5	24	48	2
LAC LAC has 26 conditional decision branches and 19 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	26	19	7	33	26	0	0
NOP NOP has 18 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	17	1	19	18	18	2
ORL ORL has 18 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	17	1	1	18	36	2
SAC SAC has 20 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	20	17	3	23	20	20	0
SAS SAS has 18 conditional decision branches and 17 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	18	17	1	1	18	36	0
BRK BRK has 18 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	16	2	20	18	18	0
CHI CHI has 18 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	18	16	2	20	18	18	6
DEN DEN has 20 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	20	16	3	4	20	41	2
TOR TOR has 16 conditional decision branches and 16 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	16	16	0	0	16	32	2
OKC OKC has 16 conditional decision branches and 14 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	16	14	1	18	16	17	6
IND IND has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Conditional path map with explicit evidence gapsCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	13	1	15	14	14	0
PHX PHX has 16 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	16	13	3	3	16	32	2
POR POR has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	14	13	1	1	14	28	4
UTA UTA has 14 conditional decision branches and 13 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	13	1	15	14	14	0
CHO CHO has 12 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	12	0	12	12	12	2
HOU HOU has 14 conditional decision branches and 12 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	14	12	2	16	14	14	2
DAL DAL has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	12	11	1	1	12	24	4
WAS WAS has 12 conditional decision branches and 11 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	12	11	1	13	12	12	2
DET DET has 10 conditional decision branches and 10 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	10	0	10	10	10	10
ATL ATL has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	8	8	0	8	8	8	0
MEM MEM has 10 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	10	8	2	12	10	10	2
MIA MIA has 8 conditional decision branches and 8 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:WithheldWithheld — No future pick control evidence	8	8	0	0	8	16	2
MIL MIL has 8 conditional decision branches and 7 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	8	7	1	9	8	8	0
PHI PHI has 6 conditional decision branches and 6 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	6	6	0	6	6	6	0
CLE CLE has 4 conditional decision branches and 4 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	4	0	4	4	4	2
GSW GSW has 4 conditional decision branches and 4 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	4	0	4	4	4	4
MIN MIN has 4 conditional decision branches and 3 conditionally open path rows. Every trade, exception and future cap route still requires a new dated test. Coverage:Partial contract-identity coverageCap context:Cap position observed; no apron triggerDraft:Provisional pick control; exact tradability unresolved	4	3	0	5	4	5	4

League rows compare evidence coverage and conditional path counts, not team quality or front-office success.