← Team Metrics
Latest

Houston Rockets

2022-23
2016-172017-182018-192019-202020-212021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26
Latest available releaseEvidence released Aug 22, 2026, 8:30 PM UTCLive database

What were the Houston Rockets in 2022-23, and what needed front-office attention?

HOU 2022-23: the clearest roster problems were Shooting and spacing, Passing connectivity, Creation. The strongest covered areas were Rebounding. The main rotation-player dependency cases were Tari Eason, Jabari Smith Jr., Alperen Sengun, Kevin Porter Jr., Kenyon Martin Jr.. Structural basketball need, injuries, replacement lineups, and financial constraints are reported separately.

CoveragePartial8 supported · 3 withheld
Cap positionOver the cap, below the tax line, on selected player charges
Next decision dateNo calendar release at this as-of time

What can be trusted

Supported strengths — production, who carries it, and what money is already committed.
Rebounding
100th percentile
Kenyon Martin Jr. carries 25.0%
Availability: No material availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

HOU 2022-23 Rebounding: this was a team strength; production ranked at the 100.0 league percentile. Kenyon Martin Jr. supplied 25.0% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Recent availability did not create a repeated additional problem. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

What needs attention

The clearest roster problems the evidence supports.
Shooting and spacing
4th percentile
Kevin Porter Jr. carries 45.7%
Availability: Isolated availability problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

HOU 2022-23 Shooting and spacing: this was one of the team's clearest roster problems; production ranked at the 4.3 league percentile. Kevin Porter Jr. supplied 45.7% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Availability created or worsened the issue in isolated recent games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Passing connectivity
4th percentile
Alperen Sengun carries 34.2%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

HOU 2022-23 Passing connectivity: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 4.3 league percentile. Alperen Sengun supplied 34.2% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 10 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Creation
17th percentile
Kevin Porter Jr. carries 26.9%
Availability: Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemMoney: Salary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Full reading

HOU 2022-23 Creation: this was a real roster weakness; production ranked at the 17.4 league percentile. Kevin Porter Jr. supplied 26.9% of the team's above-replacement production in this area. Absences made the problem worse in 10 of the final 10 covered games. Function-level salary allocation was incomplete and is withheld.

Every covered basketball function (11)
FunctionReadingLeague percentileLargest contributorRecent availabilitySalary commitment
CreationSupportedStructural team problem17th percentileKevin Porter Jr. · 26.9%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Defensive event creationSupportedMiddle of the league57th percentileTari Eason · 27.2%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Interior finishingSupportedMiddle of the league26th percentileJabari Smith Jr. · 24.4%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Passing connectivitySupportedStructural team problem4th percentileAlperen Sengun · 34.2%Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Point-of-attack defense proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldAlperen SengunRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ReboundingSupportedTeam strength100th percentileKenyon Martin Jr. · 25.0%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim pressureSupportedMiddle of the league74th percentileKenyon Martin Jr. · 22.7%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Rim protectionSupportedMiddle of the league35th percentileAlperen Sengun · 31.0%No repeated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
ScreeningWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldKenyon Martin Jr.Recent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Shooting and spacingSupportedCritical team problem4th percentileKevin Porter Jr. · 45.7%Isolated availability problemSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low
Switch coverage proxyWithheldBasketball conclusion withheldAlperen SengunRecent availability conclusion withheldSalary-to-function mapping withheld — coverage too low

Who the team depends on

What disappears when a player is removed — and whether an observed replacement five exists.
Tari Eason
Critical basketball and lineup dependence

HOU was highly dependent on Tari Eason. Removing him cost about 27.2% of event creation production, and lineups with him performed 5.6 points per 100 possessions better than lineups without him. The best supported replacement group was [Kevin Porter Jr., Jalen Green, Kenyon Martin Jr., Alperen Sengun, Jabari Smith Jr.] over 829 possessions.

rotation 45%loses 27.2% of defensive event creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Tari Eason

Kevin Porter Jr. · Jalen Green · Kenyon Martin Jr. · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr.

shrunk net -6.68 over 829 possessions

on floor 3,154 possessions · off floor 4,045 possessions

Jabari Smith Jr.
Single-skill dependence

HOU did not have strong functional backup for Jabari Smith Jr. in rim protection; removing him cost about 29.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Alperen Sengun.

rotation 62%loses 29.0% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Jabari Smith Jr.

Kevin Porter Jr. · Jalen Green · Kenyon Martin Jr. · Usman Garuba · Tari Eason

shrunk net -2.535 over 165 possessions — small sample

on floor 4,510 possessions · off floor 2,689 possessions

Alperen Sengun
Single-skill dependence

HOU did not have strong functional backup for Alperen Sengun in rim protection; removing him cost about 31.0% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Jabari Smith Jr..

rotation 55%loses 31.0% of rim protection
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Alperen Sengun

Kevin Porter Jr. · Jalen Green · Kenyon Martin Jr. · Usman Garuba · Tari Eason

shrunk net -2.535 over 165 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,988 possessions · off floor 3,211 possessions

Kevin Porter Jr.
Single-skill dependence

HOU did not have strong functional backup for Kevin Porter Jr. in creation; removing him cost about 26.9% of the team's production in that area. The next observed option was Alperen Sengun.

rotation 52%loses 26.9% of creation
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kevin Porter Jr.

Eric Gordon · Jalen Green · Kenyon Martin Jr. · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr.

shrunk net -6.94 over 237 possessions — small sample

on floor 3,718 possessions · off floor 3,481 possessions

Kenyon Martin Jr.
Replacement lineup exists, with a performance cost

HOU had an observed replacement lineup for Kenyon Martin Jr., but it came with a performance cost. The supported alternative was [Eric Gordon, Kevin Porter Jr., Jalen Green, Alperen Sengun, Jabari Smith Jr.] at -7.1 adjusted net points per 100 possessions over 822 possessions.

rotation 58%loses 25.0% of rebounding
Replacement evidence
Best observed five without Kenyon Martin Jr.

Eric Gordon · Kevin Porter Jr. · Jalen Green · Alperen Sengun · Jabari Smith Jr.

shrunk net -7.059 over 822 possessions

on floor 4,226 possessions · off floor 2,973 possessions

Function loss, lineup performance, and replacement-lineup evidence remain separate; none is causal player value.

What injuries change

Recent absences and the basketball needs they created or worsened.
Creation

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Kevin Porter Jr.

Passing connectivity

Absences repeatedly worsened an existing problem

worsened in 10 of the final 10 covered games — mainly Kevin Porter Jr.

Where money is tied up

Cap position and salary allocation — shown beside the basketball picture, never blended into it.
WithheldThe team was over the cap but below the tax on selected player charges; exception detail remains withheld.
Selected player charges
$133.0M
Share of cap
108%
Tax line
$17.3M under
First apron
$24.0M under
Second apron
No governed line that season

Salary-to-function mapping covers only 38% of charges — no function-level salary conclusion is drawn.

Exact figures
Salary cap: $123,655,000Luxury tax line: $150,267,000First apron: $156,983,000Second apron: Selected player charges: $133,014,813Source-reported payroll: $137,579,793 (source-named payroll total; not relabeled as cash or cap)

Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence.

What the evidence cannot answer

Deliberate abstentions — where the database refuses a conclusion rather than guessing.
PartialTeam picture available; function-level salary mapping incomplete8 of 11 functions supported
  • Point-of-attack defense proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Screening: Basketball conclusion withheld
  • Switch coverage proxy: Basketball conclusion withheld

Exact transaction legality: Exact transaction legality withheld — no exception-usage, cap-hold, and transaction ledger evidence

Team-season situation report. Structural basketball quality, recent availability, player dependence, replacement lineups, and financial position remain separate. No acquisition recommendation, transaction grade, coaching grade, outcome claim, or causal value is inferred.